Tuesday, 10 November 2020

Pride and Worldliness

BY WILLIAM GURNALL

"A man's pride shall bring him low." Proverbs 29:23

Religious Pride. Some are as blind as Laodicea, and know it not (Rev. 3:17). As ignorance blinds the mind, so pride is a blind before their ignorance, that they know it not. These have such a high opinion of themselves, that they take it ill that any should suspect them as such. These of all men, are most out of the way to knowledge; they are too good to learn from others, as they think, and too bad to be taught of God. The gate into Christ's school is low, and these cannot stoop. The Master Himself is so humble and lowly that He will not teach a proud scholar.

Ah, poor creatures, what a sad change have they made, to leave the word, which can no more deceive them than God Himself to trust the guidance of themselves to themselves. "He who is his own teacher," says Bernard, "is sure to have a fool for a master."

Never are you less holy, than when puffed up with the conceit of it. "Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright" (Hab. 2:4). A sign is set up at the proud man's door, that all passengers may know that a wicked man dwells there.

When men stand high, their heads do not grow dizzy until they look down. When men look down upon those that are worse than themselves, or less holy than themselves — then their heads turn round; looking up would cure this disease.

The most holy men, when once they have fixed their eyes awhile upon God's holiness, and then looked upon themselves — have been quite out of love with themselves. After the vision the prophet had of God sitting upon the throne, and the seraphim about Him, covering their faces, and crying, "Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord Almighty" — how was this gracious man smitten with the sense of his own vileness! They did no more cry up God as holy — than he did cry out upon himself as unclean (Isaiah 6:5). So Job, "Now my eye sees You! Therefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes!" (Job 42:5, 6).

Compare not yourself, with those that have less than yourself — but look on those that have far exceeded you. To look on our inferiors occasions pride. "I am not as this publican," says the Pharisee. Looking on others more eminent than ourselves, will both preserve humility, and be a spur to diligence.

A man may be very zealous in prayer and painstaking in preaching — and all the while pride is the master whom he serves, though in God's livery. It is hard starving this sin of pride — it can live on almost anything! Nothing so base, that a proud heart will not be lifted up with — and nothing so sacred, but pride will profane it. So far as pride prevails, the man prays and preaches rather to be thought good by others — rather to enthrone himself than Christ, in the opinion and hearts of his hearers.

Remember, Christian, when you have your best suit on, who made it, who paid for it. Your grace, your comfort, is neither the work of your own hands, nor the price of your own desert; be not for shame, proud of another's cost.

Pride of gifts. If once (like Hezekiah) we call in spectators to see our treasure and applaud us for our gifts and blessings — then it is high time for God to send some messengers to carry these away from us, which carry our hearts from Him. Pride of gifts hinders the receiving of good from others. Pride fills the soul, and a full soul will take nothing from God, much less from man.

Joseph's coat made him finer than his brethren — but caused all his trouble; thus great gifts lift a saint up a little higher in the eyes of men — but it occasions many temptations which you meet not with that are kept low. What with envy from their brethren, malice from Satan, and pride in their own hearts — I dare say none find so hard a work to bear up against those waves and winds.

While you are priding in your gifts — you are dwindling and withering in your grace. Such are like corn that runs up much into straw, whose ear commonly is light and thin. Grace is too much neglected, where gifts are too highly prized; we are commanded to be clothed with humility. Pride kills the spirit of praise: when you should bless God — you are really applauding yourself. Pride destroys Christian love, and stabs our fellowship with the saints to the heart. A proud man has not room enough to walk in company, because the gifts of others he thinks stand in his way. Pride so distempers the palate, that it can relish nothing that is drawn from another's vessel. Pride loves to climb up, not as Zaccheus, to see Christ — but so that others may see himself!

"God resists the proud" (James 4:6). The humble man may have Satan at his right hand to oppose him; but be sure the proud man shall find God Himself there to resist him. We must either lay self aside — or God will lay us aside. A proud sinner and a humble Savior will never agree! Christ is humble and lowly, and so resists the proud — but gives grace to the humble.

-----

From The Christian in Complete Armour by William Gurnall

What Does ‘Unequally Yoked’ Mean in 2 Corinthians 6?

by Ronni Kurtz | July 1, 2020

The Question

In the thirteen chapters of Second Corinthians, Paul exhorts the Church in Corinth with an epistle laced with beauty and glory. In these chapters, the apostle articulates the “God of all comfort” who turns the world upside-down by demonstrating that true power is found in weakness as He reconciles a sinful people to Himself and commissions them with a message of reconciliation.

While the letter is riddled with beauty, it is not without its perplexing passages. One of the chief culprits is 2 Corinthians 6:14, where Paul states, “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers.” He followed this imperative with a series of five questions used to draw a contrast, saying,

“For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness?
Or what fellowship has light with darkness?
What accord has Christ with Belial?
Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever?
What agreement has the temple of God with idols?”

Opinions proliferate about what it means to be unequally yoked. Does it pertain to marrying or dating non-believers? Is Paul thinking of business partnerships? Is it in reference to spiritual matters only, or does he also have social factors in mind? What does Paul have in mind when he exhorts believers to not be unequally yoked?

Paul’s Imagery

Paul builds his command on a stark piece of imagery. The image of a yoke draws to the mind an agricultural and farming metaphor. Those hearers with an agrarian background, or those familiar with the Pentateuch, would not have found this language surprising, as Deuteronomy 22:10 states, “You shall not plow with an ox and a donkey together.”

What Paul and Deuteronomy 22 are concerned with here is an imbalance in power and purpose. One can easily imagine the futility of pairing an ox and a donkey under the same yoke which would inseparably link their movements and efforts. The ox, due to sheer strength and size would overpower the weaker animal, leaving the field unevenly plowed, or worse.

Paul picks up on this language and goes beyond agricultural realities to say that when two parties with different passions and purposes try to operate while being yoked together—it’s a recipe for disaster.

What the Image Means

So, then, what does Paul have in mind when using the yoke imagery with unbelievers? Arguably, the most popular move to make with this passage is to interpret it as a prohibition regarding a single issue, such as marrying an unbeliever. However, John Calvin correctly denounces this interpretation, saying “Many are of opinion that he [Paul] speaks of marriage, but the context clearly shows that they are mistaken.” Calvin continues, “When, therefore, he prohibits us from having partnership with unbelievers in drawing the same yoke, he means simply this, that we should have no fellowship with them in their pollution.” The Reformer summarizes his view, saying that “to be yoked with unbelievers mean nothing less than to have fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, and to hold out the hand to them in token of agreement.”

I would agree with Calvin that Paul’s primary means of application for 2 Corinthians 6:14 is not pertaining strictly to marriages. Nor should we interpret it as banning other singular concepts like business ventures, friendships, and the like. Rather, we should understand Paul’s instruction—as Calvin did—as a prohibition to partake in idolatrous and ungodly living and worship that is contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ and forsaking any partnerships that would encourage such evil.

Why This Interpretation Fits the Context

Calvin’s understanding of the passage seems to do justice to the context of Paul’s discourse better than a strict singular application. In 2 Corinthians, Paul is largely dealing with a disobedient church—the Corinthians—who are tempted to follow the “super-apostles” instead of Paul. This church is prone to look towards worldly means of success as validation for an authentic ministry and Paul defends his apostleship and ministry while demonstrating that, in the Christian life, weakness is the way. Moreover, Chapter six is sandwiched between Paul’s call to the Corinthians to be ambassadors on behalf of Christ and another defense of his ministry. A section dealing exclusively with marriage to non-believers would be an aside having little to do with the surrounding context.

Therefore, a strict singular interpretation of the prohibition would seem to violate the context of Paul’s instruction toward the Corinthians and needlessly interject an imperative that is largely off-topic from the important correction he’s been giving these believers.

What seems more plausible is that Paul is concerned that the Corinthian church is eager to partner with whatever apostle or teaching that seems to give them cultural esteem. The Corinthians desired vain success and worldly gain, if yoking themselves to a non-believing partner could deliver this promise, the Corinthians were interested.

This is an important imperative for us to understand today as this particular temptation in not dead. In hopes of relevance, cultural capitulation, doctrinal appeasement, or worse, it is easy for Christ’s church today to consider yoking herself to those that would lead her astray.

So, while not marrying an unbeliever or potentially straying from an unbiblical business venture might be proper deductions of wisdom from this text, the Church needs to be aware of the broader application of Paul’s instruction. No cultural, numerical, or relevancy gains are worth surrendering our Biblical conviction or gospel proclamations.

Christ’s Yoke

Finally, this passage should take our eyes to Christ, as all Scripture does. For the imagery of “yoke” calls us to remember the one who stated, “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

At the end of all things, may we be found not yoked to idols but to Christ. In doing so, there will be a gospel version of the unequally-yoked paradigm as futile folks like us are yoked to Christ. He has proven to be our ox of righteousness and has plowed through the fields of God’s law with no aid from us.

----------

Ronni Kurtz

Ronni Kurtz is the Managing Editor of For The Church and also serves as the Assistant Director of Marketing at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary—where he is pursuing a Ph.D. in systematic theology. He also serves as Pastor of Teaching and Equipping at Emmaus Church. 

The World is Passing Away!

BY HORATIUS BONAR

"This world in its present form is passing away!"—1 Corinthians 7:31 

"The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God lives forever!"—1 John 2:17

The things that are seen are temporal. Ours is a dying world, and here we have no continuing city. But a few years — it may be less — and all things here are changed. But a few years — it may be less — and the Lord shall have come, and the last trumpet shall have sounded, and the great sentence shall have been pronounced upon each of the sons of men.

There is a world that which does not pass away. It is fair and glorious. It is called "the inheritance in light." It is bright with the love of God, and with the joy of Heaven. "The Lamb is the light thereof." Its gates are of pearl — they are always open. And as we tell men of this wondrous city, we invite them to enter in.

The Book of Revelation tells us the story of earth's vanity: "Then a mighty angel picked up a boulder the size of a large millstone and threw it into the sea, and said: "With such violence the great city of Babylon will be thrown down, never to be found again. The music of harpists and musicians, flute players and trumpeters, will never be heard in you again. No workman of any trade will ever be found in you again. The sound of a millstone will never be heard in you again." (18:21-22).

Such is the day that is coming on the world, and such is the doom overhanging earth — a doom dimly foreshadowed by the sad commercial disasters that have often sent sorrow into so many hearts, and desolation into so many homes.

An old minister — now two hundred years ago — lay dying. His fourscore years were well-near completed. He had been tossed on many a wave, from England to America, from America to England, again from England to America. At Boston he lay dying, full of faith and love. The evening before his death, as he lay all but speechless, his daughter asked him how it was with him. He lifted up his dying hands, and with his dying lips simply said, "Vanishing things, vanishing things!" We repeat his solemn words, and, pointing to the world, with all the vanities on which vain man sets his heart, say, "Vanishing things!"

"The world is passing away!" This is our message.

The world is passing away — like a dream of the night. We lie down to rest; we fall asleep; we dream; we awake at morn — and lo, all is fled, which in our dream seemed so stable and so pleasant! So hastens the world away. O child of mortality, have you no brighter world beyond?

The world is passing away — like the mist of the morning. The night brings down the mists upon the hills — the vapor covers the valleys; the sun rises, all has passed away — hill and valley are clear. So the world passes away, and is seen no more. O man, will you embrace a world like this? Will you lie down upon a mist, and say: This is my home?

The world is passing away — like a shadow. There is nothing more unreal than a shadow. It has no substance, no being. It is dark, it is a figure, it has motion, that is all! Such is the world. O man will you chase a shadow? What will a shadow do for you?

The world is passing away — like a wave of the sea. It rises, falls, and is seen no more. Such is the history of a wave. Such is the story of the world. O man will you make a wave your portion? Have you no better pillow on which to lay your wearied head than this? A poor world this for human heart to love, for an immortal soul to be filled with!

The world is passing away — like a rainbow. The sun throws its colors on a cloud, and for a few minutes all is brilliant. But the cloud shifts, and the brilliance is all gone. Such is the world.

With all its beauty and brightness;
with all its honors and pleasures;
with all its mirth and madness;
with all its pomp and luxury;
with all its revelry and riot;
with all its hopes and flatteries;
with all its love and laughter;
with all its songs and splendor;
with all its gems and gold — it vanishes away!

And the cloud that knew the rainbow knows it no more. O man, is a passing world like this, all that you have for an inheritance?

The world is passing away — like a flower. Beautiful, very beautiful; fragrant, very fragrant, are the summer flowers. But they wither away. So fades the world from before our eyes. While we are looking at it, and admiring it — behold, it is gone! No trace is left of all its loveliness but a little dust! O man, can you feed on flowers? Can you dote on that which is but for an hour? You were made for eternity — and only that which is eternal can be your portion or your resting place. The things that perish with the using only mock your longings. They cannot fill you — and even if they filled, they cannot abide. Mortality is written on all things here — immortality belongs only to the world to come — to that new heavens and new earth wherein dwells righteousness.

The world is passing away — like a ship at sea. With all its sails set, and a fresh breeze blowing, the vessel comes into sight, passes before our eye in the distance, and then disappears. So comes, so goes, so vanishes away this present world, with all that it contains. A few hours within sight, then gone! The wide sea o'er which it sailed, is as calm or as stormy as before; no trace anywhere of all the life or motion or beauty which was passing over it! O man, is that vanishing world your only dwelling-place? Are all your treasures, your hopes, your joys laid up there? Where will all these be when you go down to the tomb? Or where will you be when these things leave you, and you are stripped of all the inheritance which you are ever to have for eternity? It is a poor heritage at the best, and its short duration makes it poorer still. Oh, choose the better part, which shall not be taken from you!

The world is passing away — like a tent in the desert. Those who have traveled over the Arabian sands know what this means. At sunset a little speck of white seems to rise out of the barren waste. It is a traveler's tent. At sunrise it disappears. Both it and its inhabitant are gone. The wilderness is as lonely as before. Such is the world. Today it shows itself — tomorrow it disappears. O man, is that your stay and your home? Will you say of it, "This is my rest!" There is an everlasting rest, remaining for the people of God.

The world is passing away — this is the message from Heaven. "All men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field. The grass withers and the flowers fall, because the breath of the LORD blows on them. Surely the people are grass!" Isaiah 40:6-7

The world is passing away — but God ever lives. He is from everlasting to everlasting; the King eternal and immortal.

The world is passing away — but man is immortal. Eternity lies before each son of Adam as the duration of his lifetime. In light — or in darkness, forever! In joy — or in sorrow, forever!

The world is passing away — what then? This is the question that so deeply concerns man. If the world is to vanish away, and man is to live forever — then of what importance is it to know where and what we are to be forever! A celebrated physician, trying to cheer a desponding patient, said to him, "Treat life as a plaything." It was wretched counsel. For life is no plaything, and time is no child's toy, to be flung away. Life here is the beginning of the life which has no end; and time is but the gateway of eternity.

What then? You must, O man, make sure of a home in that world into which you are so soon to pass. You must not pass out of this earthly tent without making sure of the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God. When you have done this, you can lie down upon your deathbed in peace.

One who had lived a worldly life at last lay down to die; and when about to pass away he uttered these terrible words, "I am dying, and I don't know where I am going!"

Another in similar circumstances cried out, "I am within an hour of eternity, and all is dark!"

O man of earth, it is time to awake!

"How can I make sure?" you ask. God has long since answered that question, and His answer is recorded for all ages: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved." "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ! I have never done anything else," you say. If that is really true, then, as the Lord lives, you are a saved man. But is it really so? Has your life been the life of a saved man? No, truly. It has been a life wholly given to vanity. Then as the Lord God of Israel lives, and as your soul lives — you have not truly believed, and you are not yet saved.

"Have I then no work to work in this great matter of my pardon?" None! What work can you work? What work of your can buy forgiveness, or make you fit for the Divine favor? What work has God bidden you work in order to obtain salvation? None! His Word is very plain, and easy to be understood: "To him who does not work, but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness" (Rom 4:5) There is but one work by which a man can be saved. That work is not yours, but the work of the Son of God. That work is finished — neither to be taken from nor added to — perfect through all ages — and presented by Himself to you, that you may avail yourself of it and be saved.

"And is that work available for me just as I am?" It is! God has brought it to your door; and your only way of honoring it is by accepting it for yourself, and taking it as the one basis of your eternal hope. We honor the Father when we consent to be saved entirely by the finished work of His Son. We honor the Son when we consent to take His one finished work in the room of all our works. We honor the Holy Spirit, whose office is to glorify Christ, when we hear what He says to us concerning that work finished "once for all" upon the cross. Forgiveness is through Christ Jesus, who is Son of God as well as Son of man! This is our message.

Forgiveness through the one work of sin-bearing which He accomplished for sinners upon earth. Forgiveness to the worst and wickedest, to the farthest off from God whom this earth contains. Forgiveness of the largest, fullest, completest kind; without stint, or exception, or condition, or the possibility of revocation! Forgiveness free and undeserved — as free as the love of God, as free as the gift of His beloved Son. Forgiveness ungrudged and unrestrained — whole-hearted and joyful — as the forgiveness of the father falling on the neck of the prodigal! Forgiveness simply in believing; for, "by Him, all who believe are justified from all things."

Could salvation be made more free? Could forgiveness be brought nearer? Could God in any way more fully show His earnest desire that you should not be lost, but saved — that you should not die, but live? In the cross there is salvation — nowhere else. No failure of this world's hopes can quench the hope which it reveals. It shines brightest in the evil day. In the day of darkening prospects, of thickening sorrows, of heavy burdens, of pressing cares — when friends depart, when riches fly away, when disease oppresses us, when poverty knocks at our door — then the cross shines out, and tells us of a light beyond this world's darkness, the Light of Him who is the light of the world.

Monday, 9 November 2020

Do Not Love the World: Breaking the Evil Enchantment of Worldliness (A Sermon on 1 John 2:15–17)

by Andrew David Naselli [1]

Andrew David Naselli is Associate Professor of New Testament and Theology at Bethlehem College and Seminary, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and an elder of Bethlehem Baptist Church. He earned his first PhD from Bob Jones University and his second PhD from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Dr. Naselli has served as D. A. Carson’s research manager for about nine years (2006–2014). His books include How to Understand and Apply the New Testament (P&R, 2017), No Quick Fix: Where Higher Life Theology Came From, What it is, and Why it’s Harmful (Lexham Press, 2017), that condenses a more technical survey and analysis of Keswick theology (2010), Conscience: What it is, How to Train it, and Loving Those Who Differ (coauthor, Crossway, 2016), NIV Zondervan Study Bible (assistant editor, Zondervan, 2015), Perspectives on the Extent of the Atonement: 3 Views (coeditor, B&H Academic, 2015), From Typology to Doxology: Paul’s Use of Isaiah and Job in Romans 11:34-35 (Wipf & Stock, 2012), Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism (coeditor, Zondervan, 2011), and Introducing the New Testament: A Short Guide to its History and Message (editor, Zondervan, 2010). 

In C. S. Lewis’s brilliant address “The Weight of Glory,” he talks about our “desire for our own far-off country.” Then he asks, 

Do you think I am trying to weave a spell? Perhaps I am; but remember your fairy tales. Spells are used for breaking enchantments as well as for inducing them. And you and I have need of the strongest spell that can be found to wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness which has been laid upon us for nearly a hundred years.[2] 

This sermon is about breaking “the evil enchantment of worldliness.”[3] The text is 1 John 2:15–17: 

15 Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world. 17 And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever.[4] 

That text is familiar to many Christians, but let’s see if we can ask some probing questions about it that will help us understand and apply it better. Let’s ask and briefly answer twelve questions. 

1. How does this passage fit in the letter’s argument? 

This is what I think the theological message of 1 John is: You can know that you have eternal life in three interlocked ways:(1) believing in Jesus, (2) living righteously, and (3) loving believers. The burden of the letter is that you can have assurance of salvation. And the way you can have assurance is by a threefold test: 

  1. Faith is the doctrinal test. God’s children believe orthodox teachings about Christ. 
  2. Righteousness is the moral test. God’s children live righteously. 
  3. Love is the social test. God’s children love one another. 

Those are three ways you can know that you have eternal life, and they appear over and over throughout the letter. They are inseparable: right doctrine goes with right living. 

First John 2:15–17 focuses on the moral test. God’s children live righteously. God’s children live in a way that shows they love the Father and not the world. They do God’s will. 

2. What is this passage’s main idea? 

The first sentence is the main idea: “Do not love the world or the things in the world.” Everything else supports that main command. But you can’t obey that command unless you know what it means to love the world. How do you know if you are loving the world? We need to probe what the words love and world mean. 

3. What does “love” mean? (v. 15) 

The premier dictionary for Greek words of the NT time is BDAG, and it lists three senses for this Greek verb for love—ἀγαπάω: 

  1. to have a warm regard for and interest in another, cherish, have affection for, love 
  2. to have high esteem for or satisfaction with someth., take pleasure in 
  3. to practice/express love, prove one’s love 

Mark Ward wrote his PhD dissertation on “Paul’s Positive Religious Affections,” and he devotes a chapter to the Greek words for love with a focus on ἀγαπάω. He evaluates BDAG’s three senses for ἀγαπάω and concludes, “BDAG would do better to have a single composite sense for ἀγαπάω: ‘To have a warm regard for and interest in, a high esteem for or satisfaction with, cherish, have affection for, take pleasure in, love.’”[5] That makes sense to me because whatever love means in 1 John 2:15, it seems to mean the same thing whether the object is a person (“the Father”) or a thing (“the world or the things in the world”). 

John—in his typical black-and-white style—asserts that loving the Father and loving the world are mutually exclusive. You can’t love both simultaneously. 

So what does “love” mean in v. 15? It means to cherish or have affection for or take pleasure in. Do not cherish the world. Do not have affection for the world. Do not take pleasure in the world. And that leads to our next question: 

4. What does “world” mean? (v. 15) 

BDAG lists eight senses for the Greek word for world—κόσμος.[6] World in 1 John 2:15 fits sense #7: “the system of human existence in its many aspects.” BDAG elaborates with an excellent sub-definition: “the world, and everything that belongs to it, appears as that which is hostile to God, i.e. lost in sin, wholly at odds w. anything divine, ruined and depraved.” 

We know world means that in this passage because v. 16 specifies what “all that is in the world” is—“the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life.” This world is hostile to God. It is anti-God. 

As John says at the end of this letter, “the whole world lies in the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:19). As John Frame puts it, “World is the bad part of culture.”[7] So the command “Do not love the world” means “Do not take pleasure in the anti-God culture that permeates this fallen world. Do not take pleasure in worldly ways of thinking and acting. Do not take pleasure in the bad part of culture.” 

5. If it is sinful for us to love the world, then why isn’t it sinful for God to love the world? (v. 15) 

John 3:16 says, “God so loved the world ….” That is beautiful grace. Yet it is not beautiful for us to love the world. If we love the world, then we don’t love God. So how can God love the world without sinning? 

The answer is that the word world means something different in those two statements: 

  1. In John 3:16, “God so loved the world” means that God had affection for humanity in general. (In John’s Gospel, world typically refers to humans who are rebelling against the Creator.) When God loves the world, he unselfishly has affection for humanity in general. He has an unselfish saving stance toward humanity in general—people who are rebelling against their Creator.[8] That is praiseworthy. 
  2. In 1 John 2:15, “Do not love the world” means that we must not have affection for the anti-God culture that permeates this fallen world. We must not take pleasure in worldly ways of thinking and acting. When we love the world, we selfishly have affection for the anti-God culture that permeates this fallen world. We sinfully take pleasure in the bad part of culture. That is not praiseworthy; that is damnable. 

6. What are “the things in the world”? (v. 15) 

My colleague Joe Rigney wrote a book with the title The Things of Earth.[9] He argues that we should love the things in the world. The subtitle of his book is Treasuring God by Enjoying His Gifts—or you could say, Treasuring God by Loving the Things in the World. Does that harmonize with the second half of v. 15? John commands, “Do not love … the things in the world.” Rigney says we should love the things in the world.

I agree with both the apostle John and Professor Rigney. They are not contradicting each other because what John means by “the things in the world” is not what Rigney means by “the things of earth.” Verse 16 specifies what “the things in the world” are. The phrase “the things in the world” in v. 15 points forward to what immediately follows.[10] So in this context, “the things in the world” = “all that is in the world” = “the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life.” “The things in the world” here does not refer to what Rigney says we should love: the good things God created for us to enjoy as gifts from our brilliant and kind Creator. 

7. How does the second half of v. 15 relate to the first half? 

It gives a reason you should not love the world. Here’s the logic: 

  • Command (first half of v. 15): “Do not love the world or the things in the world.” 
  • Why not? Reason (second half of v. 15): “If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” And if “the love of the Father” in not in you, what does that imply? It implies that you are not one of the Father’s children. 

8. Does “the love of the Father” mean (a) the Father’s love for us or (b) our love for the Father? (v. 15)

 The Greek grammar is ambiguous, but I think the context indicates that “the love of the Father” means our love for the Father. The reason is that it seems to parallel not only the first sentence but the previous clause in its own sentence. 

  • Previous sentence: “Do not love the world or the things in the world.” The object of love is “the world or the things in the world.” 
  • Previous clause: “If anyone loves the world.” The object of love is “the world.” 
  • So it makes sense that the object of love in this sentence is the Father: “the love of the Father” = “our love for the Father.” 

You can’t have it both ways—you can’t love the world and love the Father. 

9. How does v. 16 relate to v. 15? 

The next sentence (v. 16) begins with the word “For.” This sentence explains the previous sentence: “If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” How can that be? Would you explain that, John? Why can’t I simultaneously love the world and love the Father? Answer: “All that is in the world … is not from the Father but is from the world.” 

10. What are “the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and pride of life”? (v. 16) 

The easy answer is that they specify what “all that is in the world” is. But it’s much harder to specify exactly what each phrase means. 

Some exegetes connect 1 John 2:16 with two other passages:[11]

Gen 3:6: The woman saw that …

Luke 4:1–13 (cf. Matt 4:1–11)

1 John 2:16

the tree was good for food

Command this stone to become bread.

The desires of the flesh

it was a delight to the eyes

If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.

The desires of the eyes

the tree was to be desired to make one wise

If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here.

Pride of life 

Figure 1. Comparing Gen 3:6 and Luke 4:1–13 with 1 John 2:16 

I think there is something to that. I’m not certain that the three phrases in 1 John 2:16 line up exactly with Genesis 3 and Luke 4 or that John had these parallels in mind. But the three phrases seem to line up at least roughly with Genesis 3 and Luke 4, so the parallel seems legit to me. 

I’m also not sure that the three phrases are three separate, parallel, comprehensive categories for all sin. Some exegetes think “the desires of the flesh” is a general category and that the next two phrases are subcategories. But it seems more likely that the three phrases are simply broad and overlapping ways to describe “all that is in the world.” 

Here’s what I think each phrase means: 

  1. “The desires of the flesh” = what your body sinfully craves.[12] E.g., craving immoral sex or pornography or security in an idolatrous relationship or excessive food or drink. Our fundamental problem is not what is “out there” but what is “in here.” It’s not external but internal. 
  2. “The desires of the eyes” = what you sinfully crave when you see it. Basically, this is coveting—idolatrously wanting what you don’t have.[13] 
  3. “Pride of life” = arrogance that your material possessions produce. 

Consequently, you may strut around like a peacock, proudly displaying your fashionable clothes or latest gadget or your social status. Or you may not be a peacock, yet you still find your security in your raw talents or academic accomplishments or your savings account. You are proudly independent; you don’t need God. 

One Johannine scholar says of these three phrases, “Translating this as ‘sex, money, and power’ may not miss the mark by much.”[14] 

11. How does v. 17 relate to vv. 15–16? 

I think v. 17 is a second reason for the main command in v. 15: “Do not love the world or the things in the world.” Here is how I trace the argument of this passage (see Fig. 2):[15] 

Figure 2. Phrase 1 John 2:15–17 

Why shouldn’t you love the world? Two reasons: 

Reason 1: “If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him” (v. 15c–d). 

Reason 2: “The world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever” (v. 17). The ungodly world seems so dazzling and flashy, but it’s just a flash. It’s short-lived. It’s already passing away now and will fully pass away in the future. It won’t last. It’s already expiring. That’s why you shouldn’t love the world but should rather do the will of God. Doing God’s will is the exact opposite of loving the world. Contrast how long the world will live on with how long you will live on if you do God’s will: “The world is passing away,” but “whoever does the will of God abides forever.” 

12. How should we apply this passage to how we live today? 

Of the twelve questions we have asked about this passage, this one is the hardest for me to answer. I feel much more confident about understanding what the text means than I do about specifically applying it to how we live today. Sometimes the simple question “So what?” is the hardest to answer. 

One reason applying this passage feels so challenging to me is that from about age twelve to twenty-six I lived in evangelical cultures that self-identified as fundamentalist. Such cultures have a reputation for being preoccupied with strict rules about music, clothes, and entertainment. My family moved a lot while I was growing up, so I was in a lot of different fundamentalist cultures, and some of those cultures were relatively healthy and didn’t fit the fundamentalist stereotype. But I have heard plenty of sermons that dogmatically applied “Do not love the world” to issues like why a rock beat in music is sinfully sensual at all times and in all cultures or why women should not wear pants or why Christians shouldn’t go to movie theaters. So now I tend to react negatively when people dogmatically and specifically apply what “Do not love the world” must mean for all Christians. 

But I need to be careful that I don’t overreact. While I want to be sensitive to avoid legalism and to celebrate God’s grace in Christ, I also want to be careful to avoid lawlessness that celebrates so-called grace in a selfish way.[16] So instead of dogmatically and specifically applying what “Do not love the world” must mean for you, I’m going to ask a series of questions that I hope will make you think. 

I should acknowledge that three sources served me as I compiled this list of questions: 

  1. My graduate students. I enlisted the help of the seminary students at Bethlehem College & Seminary. I asked them to reply individually to this question: What are some specific ways you are tempted to love the world? About 25% of the graduate students thoughtfully answered that question for me. 
  2. R. Kent Hughes, Set Apart: Calling a Worldly Church to a Godly Life (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2003). 
  3. C. J. Mahaney, ed., Worldliness: Resisting the Seduction of a Fallen World (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008), with a foreword by John Piper. 

One more thing: I wrestled with how to organize these questions. I thought about grouping them under three main headings that correspond to the three phrases in v. 16—“the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and pride of life”—perhaps under the broad headings of sex, money, and power. But those three phrases in v. 16 seem to overlap, especially “the desires of the flesh” and “the desires of the eyes.” So instead of grouping my questions under those three main headings, I’m grouping them under nine headings that I think are particularly relevant for us in our culture. 

What are specific ways we are tempted to love the world? Here are some questions to consider. 

1. Thinking about Sex 

  • Do you love the world when you think about sex? 
  • Do you think of sex as something beautiful and sacred that God created exclusively for a husband and wife, or have you conformed to how the world thinks about sex? 
  • Do you think that marriage and sex would be better if you or your spouse looked sexier according to the world’s standards? 
  • How do you respond to the ubiquitous sexually explicit images that the world celebrates? 
  • Do you seek out such images? 
  • Do you take second and third looks when you suddenly encounter such images while going about your business? 

2. Thinking about Sexuality and Gender 

  • There is a worldly revolution in our culture regarding sexuality and gender.[17] The issues include the role of men and women in the home, abortion, contraceptives that cause abortions, sex outside of marriage, same-sex marriage, and transgenderism. 
  • Do you love the world when you think about sexuality and gender? 

3. Using Money and Having Stuff 

  • There is a wise way to earn, spend, save, and invest money that glorifies God. But do you love the world when you earn, spend, save, and invest money?
  • Are you letting the world influence what you think you need in order to be happy? 
  • Do you prioritize being comfortable and having “nice” things, or do you have a wartime-lifestyle that prioritizes giving generously and spreading the gospel locally and globally? 
  • Do you find your treasure in the gold of this world such as new iPhones or whatever the latest gadget is? 
  • Do you love the world when you plan your future? 
  • When you envision your future, does it look basically like the typical American dream? 

4. Using Social Media 

  • Do you love the world when you use social media such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter? 
  • Are you so absorbed with social media that you are lazy in real life and neglect your responsibilities? 
  • When you see updates on social media, do they awaken the desires of your eyes with the result that you envy people and covet what they have? 
  • Do you vainly desire to have more “likes” and retweets and followers? 
  • Do you use social media to feed your ego? 
  • Do you mindlessly scroll through and absorb social media and thus let the anti-God culture constantly influence how you think about relationships and money and material possessions and social status and celebrities? 
  • Do you feel the pressure that you must always appear happy and successful on social media and thus create a façade of the real you? 
  • Do you view immodest pictures or post them of yourself or your spouse? (Immodest means “lacking humility or decency.”)  

5. Watching Shows, Movies, and Sports 

  • Do you love the world when you watch shows, movies, and sports? 
  • Do you watch so much that you don’t have time for more important activities? 
  • When you have some free time, is your habit to spend that time entertaining yourself rather than doing something more edifying? 
  • Do you allow what you watch to subtly shape your worldview to become more worldly? 
  • Do you laugh at what God hates? 
  • Do you view sexually charged nudity and rationalize it as OK? 

6. Reading Literature and Listening to Music 

  • Do you love the world when you read literature or listen to music? 
  • Do you rationalize evil storytelling or lyrics by calling it art? 
  • Do you enjoy stories that celebrate immorality—that lead your emotions to root for people to have immoral sex or to murder? 

7. Eating and Exercising 
  • Do you love the world when you eat and exercise? 
  • What motivates your eating and exercise habits? 
  • Do you simply want to be healthy so you can look good and feel good and live a long time? 
  • Do you want to have a body that looks strong or that other people think is “hot”? 

8. Relating to Other People 

  • Do you love the world when you relate to your family, friends, and neighbors? 
  • Do you buy the world’s lie that life is all about you, that what matters most is that you do what’s best for you, that you should “follow your heart” and “believe in yourself ” as you selfishly pursue your dreams? 
  • Do you compare yourself to others and ruthlessly compete against them? 
  • Do you do everything you can to exalt yourself at the expense of others? 
  • Do you value having a prominent status more than you value serving others? 
  • Do you care more about what others think about you than you care about what God thinks about you? 
  • Do you shy away from sharing the good news about Jesus with people because you are afraid of what they will think of you? 
  • Do you do what you do because you want other people to accept you and think highly of you? 
  • Do you marginalize people you think are poor or ugly or stupid or socially awkward and give special treatment to people who are rich or good looking or smart or popular? 

9. Finding Your Identity 

  • Do you love the world when you think about who you are? 
  • Do you find your identity in what other people think about you or how great you are or what you have or what you have accomplished? 
  • Do you find your identity in being an outstanding student or a model Christian or a powerful preacher or a critical thinker? 
  • When you realize what the world prizes—being brilliant or rich or beautiful or skilled or witty—do you try to get it, or if you have it, do you take pride in that and prominently display it? 

That was a lot of questions. But we could ask so many more. Asking diagnostic questions about whether you are worldly is worth doing because it can help us fight worldliness. As one preacher wisely exhorted, “We must fight worldliness because it dulls our affections for Christ and distracts our attention from Christ. Worldliness is so serious because Christ is so glorious.”[18] 

Paul argues that way at the end of Romans 13. As Augustine shared in his Confessions, this is the passage he read after he heard a child say, “Take up and read.” That was a turning point in Augustine’s life.[19] 

The night is far gone; the day is at hand. So then let us cast off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light. Let us walk properly as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and sensuality, not in quarreling and jealousy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires. (Rom 13:12–14) 

Conclusion 

So, brothers and sisters, don’t love the world or the things in the world. May God give us what Lewis called “the strongest spell that can be found to wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness.” 

Father, we love you. We love you because you first loved us. Please wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness. We don’t want to love the world, but because we are sinful, we are tempted to love the world in all kinds of ways. Please give us grace not to take pleasure in the world. Instead, help us take pleasure in you and you alone. We ask in the name of Jesus. Amen. 

Notes

  1. This article lightly revises a sermon the author preached at Bethlehem College & Seminary chapel in Minneapolis on March 1, 2017. Thanks to friends who examined a draft of this manuscript and shared helpful feedback, especially Abigail Dodds, Matt Klem, Joe Tyrpak, and Mark Ward. 
  2. C. S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory and Other Addresses (New York: Macmillan, 1949), 31. 
  3. Preachers used to address worldliness more often. I searched Charles Spurgeon’s published sermons and discovered that he used the word worldliness over 350 times. 
  4. Scripture quotations are from the ESV. 
  5. Mark L. Ward Jr., “Paul’s Positive Religious Affections” (PhD diss., Bob Jones University, 2011), 251. 
  6. (1) that which serves to beautify through decoration, adornment, adorning. (2) condition of orderliness, orderly arrangement, order. (3) the sum total of everything here and now, the world, the (orderly) universe. (4) the sum total of all beings above the level of the animals, the world. (5) planet earth as a place of inhabitation, the world. (6) humanity in general, the world. (7) the system of human existence in its many aspects, the world. (8) collective aspect of an entity, totality, sum total. 
  7. John M. Frame, The Doctrine of the Christian Life (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2008), 866. 
  8. See D. A. Carson, The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2000). Carson unpacks how the Bible speaks about God’s love in five ways: (1) The Father loves the Son ( John 3:35; 5:20), and the Son loves the Father (14:31). That kind of intra-Trinitarian love is unique. (2) God providentially loves all that he has made (Ps 145:9, 13, 17). (3) God has a saving stance toward the fallen world ( John 3:16). (4) God has a particular, effective, selecting love toward his elect (Eph 5:25). (5) God conditionally loves his own people when they obey him ( John 15:10). 
  9. Joe Rigney, The Things of Earth: Treasuring God by Enjoying His Gifts (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2015). 
  10. More specifically, the word the in the phrase “the things in the world” is what Greek grammarians call a kataphoric article. 
  11. E.g., Craig L. Blomberg, Jesus and the Gospels: An Introduction and Survey, 2nd ed. (Nashville: B&H, 2009), 260.
  12. I don’t think what John means here by “flesh” is identical to how Paul often uses flesh to refer to our sinful nature. 
  13. John Piper, Future Grace (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 1995), 221: “Covetousness is desiring something so much that you lose your contentment in God. … Coveting is desiring anything other than God in a way that betrays a loss of contentment and satisfaction in Him. Covetousness is a heart divided between two gods. So Paul calls it idolatry.” Compare the last sentence of 1 John: “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21). 
  14. D. Moody Smith, First, Second, and Third John (IBC; Louisville: John Knox, 1991), 66. 
  15. For an introduction to argument diagrams with a focus on phrasing, see ch. 5 in Andrew David Naselli, How to Understand and Apply the New Testament: Twelve Steps from Exegesis to Theology (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2017), 121–61. I prepared the phrase diagram in Fig. 2 using Biblearc.com. 
  16. There’s a tension here that parallels in some ways a tension in two categories of sermons and books: (a) One emphasizes that you should rest and enjoy the things of earth to the glory of God. For example, see Rigney, The Things of Earth; Michael Wittmer, Becoming Worldly Saints: Can You Serve Jesus and Still Enjoy Your Life? (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2015); David Murray, Reset: Living a Grace-Paced Life in a Burnout Culture (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017). (b) The other emphasizes that you should live radically and not waste your life. For example, see John Piper, Don’t Waste Your Life (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2003); Francis Chan with Danae Yankoski, Crazy Love: Overwhelmed by a Relentless God (Colorado Springs, CO: Cook, 2008); David Platt, Radical: Taking Back Your Faith from the American Dream (Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah, 2010). I agree with both emphases. Here I’m trying to faithfully apply what it means to obey what God commands in 1 John 2:15: “Do not love the world or the things in the world.” So I am emphasizing the “live radically and don’t waste your life” message. 
  17. See R. Albert Mohler Jr., We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong (Nashville: Nelson, 2015). 
  18. C. J. Mahaney, “Is This Verse in Your Bible?,” in Worldliness: Resisting the Seduction of a Fallen World (ed. C. J. Mahaney; Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008), 35. 
  19. Confessions 8.12.29.

Is The Restrainer Removed? by Carter Conlon

What are the most obvious Causes, Symptoms, and Effects of a Decline in the Spiritual Life?

BY JOHN NEWTON

Believers are, by nature, dead in trespasses and sins, even as others—but, by faith in the Son of God, they are made partakers of a new and endless life. They derive it from him; and he has said, "Because I live, you shall live also." But the life of this life, if I may so speak, its manifestation and exercise, is subject to great changes. A sick man is still alive—but he has lost the cheerfulness, activity, and vigor which he possessed while he was in health. There are many people, who if they are, as we would hope, really alive to God—are at least sick, languid, and in a declining state. May the great Physician restore them! It is sometimes said, that "the knowledge of a disease amounts to half a remedy"; which will hold thus far in the present case, that unless we are sensible of our disorder and our danger—we shall not be heartily solicitous for a recovery.

The causes and symptoms or effects of such a decline are very numerous, nor is it always easy to distinguish them, for they have reciprocal influence to strengthen each other. What may be assigned as the cause, in many cases, is likewise a proof that the plague is already begun; and the effects may be considered as so many causes, which render the malady more confirmed, and more dangerous.

Among the many general causes, we may assign a principal place to DOCTRINAL ERROR. I do not include every mistake or erroneous sentiment, which may be adopted or retained; but there are some errors, which, for the suddenness and violence of their operation, may be compared to 'poison'! Thus the Galatians, by listening to false teachers, were seduced from the simplicity of the gospel; the consequence was, that they quickly lost the blessedness they had once spoken of. Poison is seldom taken in the gross; but, if mingled with food, the mischief is not suspected until it is discovered by the effect.

Thus those who are employed in poisoning souls, generally make use of some important and beneficial truth, as a vehicle by which they convey their malignant drug into the minds of the unwary! Perhaps they speak well of the person and atonement of Christ, or they exalt the riches and freedom of divine grace—while under the veil of these fair pretenses, they insinuate prejudices against the nature or necessity of that holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord. Others speak strongly in general terms in favor of personal holiness—but their aim is to withdraw the heart from a dependence upon the Savior's blood, and the influences of his Holy Spirit, without which the most studied exactness of conduct, differs no less from the holiness of the gospel—than a picture or a statue, or a dead carcass, differs from a living man.

Whoever is thus prevailed upon, in the great and essential points of Scriptural doctrine—to separate, in his judgment and experience, those things which God has joined together, is already infected with a disease in its own nature mortal, and his religion, unless the Lord mercifully interposes, will degenerate into either licentiousness or formality!

We live in a day when too many are tossed to and fro, like ships without helm or pilot, by various winds of doctrine; and therefore those who wish well to their own souls, cannot be too much upon their guard against that spirit of curiosity and desire for 'new things', which the apostle describes by the metaphor of having itching ears, a desire of hearing every novel and singular teacher, lest they imbibe errors before they are aware, and become a prey to the sleight and craftiness of those who lie in wait to deceive!

SPIRITUAL PRIDE AND SELF-ADMIRATION will likewise infallibly cause a declension in the divine life, though the mind may be preserved from the infection of doctrinal errors, and though the power of gospel truth may for a time have been really experienced. If our attainments in knowledge and giftedness, and even in grace—seduce us into a good opinion of ourselves, as if we were wise and good—we are already ensnared, in danger of falling every step we take, of mistaking the right path, and proceeding from bad to worse, without a power of correcting or even of discovering our deviations—unless and until the Lord mercifully interposes, by restoring us to a spirit of humility and dependence upon Himself. For God, who gives more grace to the humble—resists the proud! He beholds them with abhorrence—in proportion to the degree in which they admire themselves. It is the invariable law of his kingdom, that everyone who exalts himself—shall be abased.

True Christians, through the remaining evil of their hearts, and the subtle temptations of their enemy, are liable, not only to the workings of that pride which is common to our fallen nature—but to a certain kind of pride, which, though the most absurd and intolerable in any person, can only be found among those who make profession of the gospel. We have nothing but what we have received, and therefore to be proud of titles, wealth, knowledge, success, or any temporal advantages, by which the providence of God has distinguished us—is downright sinful! And for those who confess themselves to be 'sinners', and therefore deserving of nothing but misery and wrath—to be proud of those peculiar blessings which are derived from the gospel of his grace, is a wickedness of which even the demons are not capable of!

The apostle Paul was so aware of his danger of being exalted above measure, through the abundant revelations and peculiar favors which the Lord had afforded him, that he says, "There was given me a messenger of Satan to buffet me." He speaks of this sharp dispensation as an additional mercy, because he saw it was necessary, and designed to keep him humble and attentive to his own weakness.

Ministers who are honored with singular abilities and success, have great need of watchfulness and prayer on this account. The Lord sees not as man sees. Simple-hearted hearers are apt to admire their favorite preacher, and almost to consider him as something more than man in the pulpit, taking it for granted that he is deeply affected himself with the truths, which, with so much apparent liberty and power, he proposes to them; while, perhaps, the poor worm is secretly indulging self-applause, and pleasing himself with the numbers and attention of those who hang upon his words!

Perhaps such thoughts will occasionally rise in the minds of the best ministers; but, if they are allowed, if they become habitual, and enter strongly into the idea he forms of his own character; and if, while he professes to preach Christ Jesus the Lord—he is preaching himself, and seeking his own glory—he is guilty of high treason against the Majesty of him in whose name he speaks. And sooner or later, the effects of his pride will be visible and noticed. Errors in judgment, gross misconduct, and abatement of zeal, of gifts, of influence, are evils, always to be dreaded, when spiritual pride has gained an ascendancy, whether in public or in private life. "For who makes you different from anyone else? What do you have that you did not receive? And if you did receive it, why do you boast as though you did not?" 1 Corinthians 4:7 "The Lord Almighty has planned it, to bring low the pride of all glory and to humble all who are renowned on the earth." Isaiah 23:9

AN INORDINATE DESIRE AND ATTACHMENT TO THE THINGS OF THIS PRESENT WORLD, may be assigned as a third prevailing cause of a spiritual declension. Unless this evil principle is mortified in its root—by the doctrine of the cross—it will in time prevail over the most splendid profession. That love of the world, which is inconsistent with the true love of God—manifests itself in two different ways, as men by temper and habit are differently inclined:

The first is covetousness or greediness for gain. This was the ruin of Judas, and probably the cause of the defection of Demas. By the honorable mention made of him in some of Paul's epistles, Demas seems to have had much of Paul's confidence and esteem for a season. Yet at length his covetous passion prevailed, and the last account we have of him from the apostle, is, "Demas has deserted me—because he loved this present world." 2 Timothy 4:10

Again, there are people not chargeable with the love of money for its own sake—for they rather squander it—than hoard it. Yet they are equally under the influence of a worldly spirit! They manifest their worldly hearts—by an expensive taste in the articles of dress, furniture and feasting—which are always unsuitable to a Christian profession.

It is not easy to exactly mark out the precise line of Christian conduct in these respects, which befits the different situations in which the providence of God has placed us. Nor is it necessary, to those who are poor in spirit—and upright in heart. A simple desire of pleasing God, and adorning the gospel, will solve most cases of how a believer should spend his money—which occupy little and trifling minds. The inclination of our heart—will always direct and regulate our voluntary expenses. Those who love the Lord, and whose spirits are lively in His service, will avoid both stinginess and selfish extravagance. They will rather lean to the frugal side in how they spend their money on themselves—that they may be better able to promote God's cause, and to relieve the necessities of His people.

Misers, who can be content with the mere form of religion, will hoard all they can save—in order to gratify their avarice! Others will spend all they can spare—to gratify their vanity, or their worldly appetites!

It is not easy to determine which of these evils is the greatest. Perhaps of the two, the miser is least accessible to conviction, and consequently the most difficult to be reclaimed. But a desire for extravagance and indulgence, if persisted in, will gradually lead to such compliances with the spirit and maxims of the world, as will certainly weaken, if not wholly suppress—the exercise of vital godliness. In whatever degree the "love of the world" prevails—the "health of the soul" will proportionably decline.

"People who long to be rich, fall into temptation and are trapped by many foolish and harmful desires that plunge them into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is at the root of all kinds of evil. And some people, craving money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows!" 1 Timothy 6:9-10.

Many other causes might be enumerated—but most of them may be reduced to the heads I have already mentioned. The practice of a single sin, or the omission of a single duty—if allowed against the light of conscience, and, if habitual, will be sufficient to keep the soul weak, unfruitful, and uncomfortable, and lay it open to the impression of every surrounding temptation. Sometimes unfaithfulness to light already received, perverts the judgment, and then errors which seem to afford some countenance or plea for a sin which the heart will not give up, are readily embraced, to evade the remonstrances of conscience. At other times, errors, incautiously admitted, imperceptibly weaken the sense of duty, and by degrees, spread their influences over the whole conduct. Faith and a good conscience are frequently mentioned together by the apostle, for they are inseparable; to part with one is to part with both. Those who hold the mystery of faith in a pure conscience, shall be preserved in a thriving frame of spirit, they shall grow in grace, go on from strength to strength, shall walk honorably and comfortably. But so far as the doctrines or the rules of the gospel are neglected, a wasting sickness will prey upon the vitals of religion, a sickness, in its nature mortal, and from which none recover—but those on whom God mercifully bestows the grace of repentance unto life.

The symptoms of such a soul sickness are very numerous and diversified, as tempers and situations vary. A few of those which are more generally apparent, and sure indications of a decline in religion are the following.

Bodily sickness is usually attended with loss of appetite, inactivity, and restlessness. Likewise, the sickness of the soul deprives it of rest and peace, causes a dullness and indolence in the service of God, and an indisposition to the means of grace, to secret waiting upon God, and to the public ordinances. These appointments, so necessary to preserve spiritual health, are either gradually neglected and given up, or the attendance upon them dwindles into a mere formal round, without relish and without benefit.

To the healthy man, plain food is savory—but the palate, when vitiated by sickness, becomes picky and fastidious, and hankers after varieties and delicacies. Likewise, when the sincere milk of the gospel, plain truth delivered in plain words, is no longer pleasing—but a person requires curious speculations, or the frothy eloquence of man's wisdom, to engage his attention, it is a bad sign. For these are suited to nourish, not the constitution—but the disease.

From slighting or trifling with those means which God has provided to satisfy the soul—the next step usually is—to seek relief from a compliance with the spirit, customs, and amusements of the world. And these compliances, when once allowed, will soon be defended; and those who cannot approve or imitate such conformity, will be represented as under the influence of a narrow, legal, or pharisaic spirit.

The sick professor is in a delirium, which prevents him from feeling his disease—and he rather supposes the alteration in his conduct is owing to an increase of wisdom, light, and liberty. He considers the time when he was more strict and circumspect as a time of ignorance, will smile at the recollection of what he now deems his childish scruples, and congratulates himself that he has happily outgrown them, and now finds that the services of God and the world are not so incompatible as he once thought them to be.

Yet while he thus relaxes the rule of his own conduct, he is a critically severe observer of the behavior of others. He sharply censures the miscarriages and even the mistakes of ministers and professors, if an occasion offers, and speaks of these things, not weeping as the apostle did—but with pleasure, and labors to persuade himself, that the strictness so much talked of, is either a cloak of hypocrisy, or the fruit of superstition. True Christians seldom meet with more uncandid misconstruction, or undeserved reproach, than from those who, having once been their companions, afterwards desert them.

When the disorder is at this height, it is truly dangerous, and indeed, as to any human help, desperate. But power belongs to God. May it please him to remember in mercy those who are near unto death, to restore them to their right minds, and to recover them to himself. Otherwise, "it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them!"

------

From The Letters of John Newton 

4 Ways the World Will Pressure You to Conform

BY TREVIN WAX  |  AUGUST 4, 2016

Many older evangelicals view the USA in ways that resemble Israel in the Old Testament: God has chosen to pour His blessing on this nation and to commission it for His purposes of extending freedom throughout the world. 

Many younger evangelicals view the USA in ways that resemble ancient Babylon: we live in a society that is increasingly hostile to God’s truth and God’s people.

Neither framing of our current situation fully captures the reality. The United States is neither Israel nor Babylon, and both frameworks face problems when applied too closely to today’s situation. Still, the metaphor of “exile” remains an apt description of Christians who are sojourners in this world (1 Peter 2:11).

Pressured Exiles

We are exiles in every age, in every country, but perhaps we sense that reality more powerfully in places where Christians are marginalized, with privileges stripped and penalties imposed as a way of pressuring us toward cultural compromise.

I recently edited several Gospel Project sessions from Dr. Daniel Akin, president of Southeastern Seminary. His sessions cover the book of Daniel, which describes the time when Jews who were exiled to Babylon showed incredible courage and faithfulness.

Akin lays out four ways in which the Babylonian empire sought to bring the Jewish exiles in line with their pagan ways. These strategies show us how the world, in every era, can pressure Christians to conform.

#1. Isolation

Akin writes:

“The first step in making Babylonians out of the four Hebrew teenagers was isolation from their homeland, family, and friends. The Babylonian strategy was to seize upon their vulnerability once they were separated from all that was familiar. Over time, they would be more likely to abandon their faith and become like the Babylonians.”

Being in exile doesn’t harm the Christian. Not being with God’s people does.

We often assume that younger evangelicals who wander from their faith for a season have encountered intellectual arguments that dismantled their shallow belief system. Argumentation may play a role, but the bigger factor when college students walk away from the faith is that they’ve usually walked away from the Church, the place where God’s Spirit is at work among God’s people.

Isolation from other believers and immersion into a world of false assumptions make it difficult to maintain your Christian convictions.

#2. Indoctrination

Akin writes:

“The second step was to take these sharp and impressive young men and enroll them in an educational school for three years (vv. 4-5). They needed to be indoctrinated in the ways of the Babylonians—to become experts in the Babylonian language, philosophy, literature, science, history, and astrology. Religion would have been part of the curriculum too.”

Worldly indoctrination takes place all the time, through education, entertainment, societal expectations, etc.

Many Christians are unprepared to face the doctrines of a society that believes:

  1. faith in God is a personal, private thing with little to no bearing on the public sphere
  2. all religions are valid paths to discovering one’s own fulfillment
  3. the purpose of life is to enjoy yourself by finding what makes you happy, over against what family, church, or society tells you
  4. the human person can be reinvented and recreated in line with whatever identity a person chooses.

If we are to see how indoctrination plays a role in conforming us to the world, we must learn to see these and other doctrines on display in our society.

#3. Assimilation

“The third step was to totally immerse these followers of God into the world of Babylon (v. 5). They would need to change their minds and their lifestyle, to eat and drink like the Babylonians. The strategy was to entice them with the delicacies and privileges of their new life.”

The world will celebrate those who reject their religious heritage or their initial beliefs.

Just look at the news stories about celebrities or singers who no longer believe what their traditional churches taught about God. Or the Christian leaders who sever themselves from the church’s historic teaching about sex and marriage. What the Church mourns, the world celebrates. What the world celebrates, the Church must mourn.

The only way to resist the lure of assimilating to the world is to rest in the love and approval of God. The voice we listen to the most—the Lord cheering on our faithfulness or the world cheering for our compromise—will have outsized influence in the path we choose.

#4. Confusion

“In the ancient world, changing one’s name was a big deal. It went to the core of a person’s identity. Giving the Hebrews new names in Babylon was a way of confusing them, reorienting their lives away from their past and toward the pagan gods of Babylonian culture. . . . Daniel and his three friends would have to fight to remember their identity and remain faithful.” 

In WWII, when the Jews were rounded up and placed in ghettos and then concentration camps, they were given numbers instead of their names. The Jewish young men in Daniel’s time were given new names, in order to confuse and alter their sense of being and identity.

Amazingly, Daniel and his friends discovered that in being true to their God-given identity, they were able to bless the Babylonian nation. Daniel climbed the ranks of the king’s administration. His friends’ courage wowed the king.

Had God’s people abandoned their identity, they would have failed to bless their captors. By maintaining their distinctive vision, no matter the pressure, they brought blessing to the world.

Conclusion 

All Christians are to live as sojourners and exiles, blessing the world around us by refusing to conform to its patterns of thought and behavior. As Augustine said, sometimes we must stand against the world for the good of the world.

In every age, the world implements strategies of isolation, indoctrination, assimilation, and confusion, and in every age, the church must resist with confidence and courage, trusting that our faithfulness will be a gift to the nations we know will one day bow before the world’s true King.