Saturday 11 March 2023

A Powerful Reason for Coming to Christ

By Charles Haddon Spurgeon

[Editor’s Note: Bibliotheca Sacra was prompted to reprint this sermon from the famous preacher of Metropolitan Tabernacle for two reasons: not only because of its intrinsic value as a God-sent message, but also because a former student of Spurgeon’s College (admitted to school in 1889 by Spurgeon personally) presented Dallas Seminary with the original sermon notes for this homily preached March 21, 1880. They had been proffered Rev. Arthur G. Edgerton, Hon. C. F. in 1904 by the twin sons of C. H. Spurgeon, Pastors Charles and Thomas Spurgeon. The text of the following message is Mark 3:8, “A great multitude, when they had heard what great things he did, came unto him.”]

“A great multitude, when they had heard what great things he did, came unto him.”—Mark 3:8

The opposition of the great ones of the earth did not, after all, hinder the cause of Christ. The Pharisees, who were the leaders of religious thought, combined with the Herodians, who were the court party, to destroy Jesus; but at the very moment when their wrath had reached its highest pitch the crown about the Saviour’s person was greater than ever. Let us not, therefore, dear friends, be at all dismayed if great men and learned men, and nominally religious men, should oppose the simple gospel of Christ. All the world is not bound up in a Pharisee’s phylactery, nor held in chains by a philosopher’s new fancy. If some will not have our Saviour, others will: God’s eternal purpose will stand, and the kingdom of His Anointed shall come. If our Lord Jesus be rejected by the great, nevertheless the common people hear Him gladly. To the poor the gospel is preached, and it is His joy and His delight that out of them He still gathers a company who, though poor in this world, are rich in faith, and give glory to God. I would have you, beloved, count upon opposition, and regard it as a token of coming blessing. Dread not the black cloud, it does but prognosticate a shower. March may howl and bluster, and April may damp all things with its rains, but the May flowers and the autumn harvest of varied fruits will come, and come by this very means. Go on and serve your God in the serenity of holy confidence and you shall live to see that the hand of the Lord is not to be turned back, though the kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together.

Those who came to Christ in such great multitudes did not all come from right motives, and I shall not assume that they did. Some came from idle curiosity, no doubt: others came to listen to what He had to say, but were not prepared to believe in Him. We know that many came to be fed with loaves and fishes, swayed by the most mercenary motives. Still, in the case now under notice large numbers came to Jesus because they had heard of the great things which He did, hoping that He would do something of the same kind for them; for multitudes of those who came were sick folk, plague-smitten, stricken with disease, and they came that by touching Him they might be delivered from all their sufferings. This boon they gained, and glorified the name of the Lord. I shall not, therefore, stay to divide out the characters which made up the crowd, but remind you that we must never expect that all who come to hear the gospel will receive it. Just as Jesus went up into the mountain, and there called out to Himself whom He would, so does He form His church, which is an assembly of called out ones, whom the sovereign Lord selects from the congregation of hearers that they may become a church of believers. The process of selection and separation is always going on, and the great heap which lies on the threshing floor is being daily winnowed to divide the golden grain from the worthless chaff. For our present purpose only we shall just now view those who literally came to Christ as types of those who come spiritually. Many, I trust, who are present at this time will come to Jesus for the same reason that these people came, namely, because they have heard of the great things which have been done by Him. So to our work at once.

Three things are before us. The first is the attraction,—“They had heard what great things he did”; secondly, the gathering—“They came unto him”; and thirdly the context furnishes us with this, the result of the attraction and the gathering. We find it written “He had healed many; insomuch that they pressed upon him for to touch him, as many as had plagues.”

I. Here is the ATTRACTION—”they had heard what great things he did.” My dear hearers, the case of these people is parallel with your own. There must be very few of you here but what have heard of the great things which Jesus Christ has done.

Let us note, first, that these people had heard with somewhat of a believing ear. Stories floated about concerning one who had healed blindness, palsy, leprosy; and they accepted the statements as facts. A lame man told how he had been made to leap like a hart, and a blind man declared that his eyes had been opened, and as these wonders passed from mouth to mouth these people believed them to be true. I know that even those of you who are not converted yet believe what is recorded in these four Gospels concerning the miracles that Jesus wrought. You are persuaded that the records are authentic; you believe that the Lord Jesus did heal the sick, and that He did raise the dead and cast out devils. You also accept the grand gospel statement that He is able to save unto the uttermost those that come unto God by Him. Believing so much as that, you ought to believe a good deal more, and I pray the Holy Spirit now to lead you to that further faith. If you have come as far as that, the most reasonable thing to do is to go to Him with your own case and trust Him to heal you. I am persuaded that I may go very far with many here present in a statement of their beliefs. You believe that Jesus Christ has done great spiritual wonders for multitudes. You have been told of great sinners whose hard hearts have been softened, whose characters have been changed, whose lives have been renewed, whose sins have been forgiven. You have met with such, have you not? The deed of grace was performed upon your own brother, perhaps, or upon some intimate friend, or some person of public notoriety. You know many such cases, and you believe them to be genuine wonders of grace. You do not think that conversion is all a delusion; you have not reached that degree of unbelief. Indeed, instead of unbelief, you are filled with ardent admiration and feel a measure of desire to be yourself saved; and while sitting in this house you have often said, “Yes, I believe it is so. Oh that the mighty grace of God would renew me, and that I could touch the hem of the Saviour’s garment that He might save even me.” Believing so much as you do, you ought in all reason to believe more. I mean you should go on to trust Him who has wrought these great things, and place your own case in His hands and leave it there. This is the legitimate course to pursue. A man believes a certain medicine to have wrought great cures, and he knows that he himself is sick of the disease which it is meant to heal; why, it seems as if no one needs to say, “The next step is that you should try that medicine upon yourself.” Yet it grieves me that so many of you do not proceed to this saving point, but linger on the borders of faith. You see the river of the water of life, and wish to drink, for you are sure that it would quench your thirst, and yet you are in danger of perishing in sight of the flowing stream. O, Holy Spirit, remove the madness of sin, and teach men true wisdom.

The many who came to Jesus felt themselves drawn because they had heard of the great things which he had done and believed them; they proceeded, however, to the second step which I have already indicated, for they drew from what they had heard an argument of hope. They said, “Has He done these great things to others? Why should He not work the same gracious miracles upon us?” The palsied man said, “He that was sick as I am has been recovered; surely, if I could get near to Jesus, and could catch His eye, He would restore me.” The blind said, “He healed one like myself: oh, if I could but sit where He passes by I would cry, ‘Thou Son of David, have mercy on me,’ and He would open my eyes, too.” They could not be at once sure that He would heal them, for that He works a cure in one is not in itself a proof that He will work upon another; but they were further informed that He delighted in mercy, and that He was gentle and gracious, and easily entreated, and therefore they concluded that if such an One had power to work such beneficent miracles, and evidently had a will to work them, they had but to come to Him and they would be partakers of His healing power. O that my unconverted hearers would act reasonably at this time, and draw a like conclusion. I pray you, dear friends, see how sensible these people were, that you may imitate them. To me it seems as plain as the working out of a proposition in mathematics. Jesus has saved such as I am, therefore He can save me. To believe in Him is as reasonable an act as to eat that which is good when you know it is good, and know that you need it; or to drink that which quenches thirst, when you perceive that it is suitable for that purpose, and that you are in need of drink. O that your hearts would say—Jesus Christ has wrought great deeds of grace; He is evidently willing to work more; let me, then, come to Him and trust myself in His hands. If this be a time of cool, collected thought, and the Holy Spirit work in us wisdom, it will again happen that “A great multitude, when they had heard of the great things which Jesus did, came unto Him.”

One more step should be mentioned. No doubt these persons were partly urged to come to him by their own sad condition. Some of them were full of pain through bodily plagues, and others suffered poverty and wretchedness through being blind, halt, lame, or withered, and they were anxious to be delivered from their infirmity and the poverty which came of it. Being convinced that their cases were similar to those which had been healed by Christ, they felt an eager desire to see what He could do for them. Now, I know that I may call my hearers to Christ till I lose my voice, but none will come but those who feel that they need Him; but, my dear unconverted hearers, you do need Him whether you know it or not. There is a disease upon you which has already brought you down to spiritual death, and will bring you down to hell ere long. The most moral of you, the most amiable of you, unless Jesus shall look upon you in love, is carrying about within himself a plague of the heart which will be your eternal ruin; Jesus must save you, or you are lost. There is no hope for any man among you except it come from Him. Do you know this? If so, come at once to the Saviour. Do you not know it? Then believe it to be so, for so it is, and let the conviction lead you to seek His face.

But, recollect, these people did not only come because they were sick, or because they felt they were sick, for they had long known and felt their sicknesses, and had remained at home, or had resorted to other physicians, or to Bethesda’s pool, or to some other famous fount. They came to Jesus because, knowing and feeling their need, they also perceived that Jesus was able to meet their case. Come then to Christ, O my sin-stricken hearer, because, be your condition what it may, He can meet it. Are you troubled with hardness of heart? By His Spirit He can take away the heart of stone, and give you a heart of flesh. Is your difficulty unbelief? You cannot see the truth, but the Lord Jesus can open the eyes of him that was born blind. Is it a case of want of power? Is your hand withered? The Lord can bid the withered hand be stretched out, and it shall be done. It is not possible that there should be any moral or spiritual disease about any one of you that will baffle the power of my great Lord and Master. If you do but come to Him He can and will make you every whit whole. He has already dealt with cases like yours, as bad as yours, as desperate as yours: in the record of His cares there are instances parallel to your own, and some which even surpass them in difficulty. Depend on it, He is able to do again what He has already done, for He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. His arm is not shortened that He cannot save, He can reach as far as sin can go, and draw back those whom Satan has driven to the pit’s mouth. Now, be reasonable, and act upon this fact. May the Spirit of God lead you in the way of understanding, and then you will say today, “I also will join that multitude who, having heard of the great things which Jesus did, came to Him.” God grant it may be so: yea, He will grant it, for His word shall not return unto Him void.

II. Secondly, I shall ask you to think of THE GATHERING. We have seen the attraction, now let us see what it drew together. “They came unto Him.” Observe, then, that hearing did not content them. I wish I could say this of all my hearers. These people heard the story of what Christ had done, and I should not wonder but what they said, “It is good news; rehearse it in our ears a second time.” They were told that He had opened the eyes of a blind man, and a blind man who heard it cried out, “Gladsome tidings: tell me that again.” I should not wonder if that blind man went many times to the house of the person who reported the cure, and said, “Tell me again of this matter.” The woman, too, who was sick with internal disease, said, “You told us of one that was healed; tell us of that marvel again.” Yes, but what would you have thought if they had kept on week after week, saying, “Tell us that story! tell us that story!” and then had gone home and said, “We feel so much better; we feel comforted by hearing this good news”? What fools they would have been to have been satisfied with a mere report of other people’s cures, without going to the great Physician to obtain healing for themselves. Did you not sing the other day,

“Tell me the story often,
For I forget so soon;
The early dew of morning
Has passed away at noon”?

Why should you be told that tale so often? Will you never draw the inference that Jesus is able to save you, and will you never go to Him for yourselves? I am afraid that some of you are getting satisfied with coming to the Tabernacle, and that you are beginning to think, “There is hope for me; I always hear the word of God; I am a regular hearer of the gospel of Jesus.” Yes, but that is not it. Those who are hearers only are not blessed in the deed. A hungry man hears that there is bread given away to the poor, and he says, “Tell me where the food is given and on what terms, and I will hasten to get it, for I am famished.” Do you think the poor starving wretch will stop here a week, and be refreshed by merely hearing about bread? Not he; he will die if he does that. He may perhaps ask again for information and say, “Tell me once more; give me plain directions where to go, and I will hasten to be fed as others have been”; but he will not expect to fill his empty stomach with merely hearing the news; he is not so stupid as that. I am compelled to feel that some of you are very short of sense when you are dealing with your souls. Why, some of you might almost sing:

Tell me the same old story,
Though you have cause to fear
That I shall miss of glory,
And die with grace so near.

O that this fooling would come to an end: think me not harsh, I am but honest; it is fooling, and nothing better, to go on hearing the word and refusing to obey its call. May God’s grace lead you to come to Jesus at once. O do not be hearers only. Turn your faces Christward, and accept His great salvation.

Observe, next, that these people did not wait until Jesus came to them. That we are to wait till Jesus comes to us is a common error: a sort of orthodox wickedness, a rebellious unbelief dressed out as humble submissiveness. I have known this preached—that we are to wait at the pool of the ordinances, in the hope that one of these days the angel may trouble the pool and we shall step in. Those who talk so are not as a rule the most successful of soul-winners, and that fact reminds me of a story I have heard of a Scotchman who had attended the ministry of an Episcopal personage for some years. At last Donald forsook the Episcopal Church, and when he was missed the pastor came to him. “Why don’t you come to church, Donald?” “Because I want to be saved; and I get no good with you.” “Ah,” said the bishop, “you should wait at the pool.” “I have been waiting at the pool a long time,” said Donald, “a very long while, and no good has come of it.” “But, Donald, you know the man who waited was healed at last.” “Ah, well, sir, but he had some encouragement, for he saw some step in before him, but all these years that I have waited at your pool I have never seen one step in yet, and therefore I will wait no longer.” Donald was right; no man can afford to run so terrible a risk as to remain in disobedience in the bare hope of some unpromised salvation. The gospel narrative does not teach us to wait at the pool. I want to call particular attention to that fact. See you the crowd lying around the pool of Bethesda? What did Jesus do when He came walking along that morning through the five porches? Listen, ye sick folk, waiting still at the pool. Does He say, “Wait patiently”? Not a word of it; but, singling out a man who was among the most despairing, He said, “Rise, take up thy bed, and walk.” That is the gospel. It is a divine command to believe and live. Our Lord comes here at this moment by His gospel, and He does not say to you, “Wait, wait, wait,” but, “Behold, now is the accepted time; now is the day of salvation.” Believe in Jesus now, for he that believeth in Him hath everlasting life. Look to Him and be saved. The gospel which is preached in your ears is a voice from Jesus Himself, attended by His own divine power, and if you feel it to be such, you will obey it, and you shall find salvation now, and wait no longer. These people did not stop till Jesus journeyed into their own regions, but when they heard what great things He did, they came unto Him. May you be led of the Spirit to do the same.

Note again, that these people did not stop at His disciples. Satan tries to keep men from Christ by pointing them to ministers, evangelists, or other eminent believers. Persons are impressed under a sermon, and they say, “I should like to speak with some Christian man.” That is very good, but after all it is not the thing which is commanded by the gospel. You are to believe in the Master, and it will not suffice to speak to the servants. “But I would like to go into the enquiry room,” says one. Very well, I do not condemn that action, but the best enquiry room for a seeking sinner is his own bedchamber, where he seeks the Lord at once, with no one between him and his Redeemer. Why, if you could pick out the most earnest and thoughtful divines that ever lived, and you could have twelve of them locked up at home, so that you might go and talk to them all day and all night long, it would not be worth one bad farthing to you, and it might even be an injury to you, if it kept you from going straight to Jesus Christ. There is no salvation in men, and ministers must not be mistaken for priests. I shake off the thought of being a priest as Paul shook off the viper from his hand. I have often said I would sooner be called devil than priest, if by that word is meant that I have any priesthood beyond that which belongs to all my fellow Christians, or any power to forgive sin, or to impart grace. My ministry is for the extolling of Jesus, and not for the magnifying of myself and my brethren. I dare not say, “Behold the priesthood! Behold the church! Behold the sacraments!” My one business is to cry, “Behold the Lamb of God.” I point you away from all ministries to Jesus Christ the minister of the new covenant, who alone can save your souls. These people were wise in not staying at the disciples, for they could not meet their varied needs. They did not rest in the society of the Virgin Mother, nor in that of Peter, or James, or John, but they hastened at once to the Lord Jesus Himself to touch His blessed person for themselves. In this I would have you all imitate them. O that you would

“Steal away, steal away to Jesus,
Steal away home;
For Jesus waits to save you.”

To no one else but Jesus go, for the great things that He did, and not the poor things that such worms as we are can ever do, should raise hope in your bosoms.

Observe again that these people who came to Jesus in such crowds must have left their business. I do not know what became of their farms, their olive gardens, their cattle, their shops, but they certainly left them to journey to Jesus. We do not commend any man for neglecting his business and daily calling; but I will say this, that when a man’s soul is not saved he cannot be blamed if he neglects everything till it is. That woman who came out in the morning with her waterpot to draw water from the well was doing a very useful and proper action, for I dare say those at home needed water to drink; but after she had heard Christ speak, it is written, “The woman left her waterpot.” Some of those at home may have said, “Where is the water, mistress?” But she would reply, “I have not thought of the poor waterpot. Come, see a man that told me all things that ever I did; is not this the Christ?” Ah, if you do leave your water pots to find Christ you may very well be excused. O working man in soul trouble, if you are out with a cart and the horse should stand still in the street while you breathed a prayer for salvation, who could blame you? If the engine paused while the stoker cried for mercy, or the shuttle lingered while the weaver begged for pardon, would there not be a justifiable excuse? If the shop shutters were kept up for an hour later than usual while the tradesman sought the Saviour, yea, if the business of the senate-house stood still, and all the commerce of a nation stayed while but one soul sought Christ, it were worth while; for what human business can equal the salvation of the souls of men? Elections occupy men’s thoughts just now; but what are all these compared with making your calling and election sure? You are candidates for heaven, and there is more importance in eternal election than in all other elections under heaven, for when everything else shall have passed away this must endure. See to the one thing needful, with Mary, even if you do for a while neglect what Martha thinks to be the urgent demands of the household. Let your first care be for your soul, “For what shall it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul?”

Many of these people, too, came from a great distance. Some came from the south, from Judea; others came from the north, from Tyre and Sidon; some from across the river Jordan; others from the hills of Edom. Rough roads and deep rivers could not keep those back who resolved to come to Christ. O souls, if you want Christ, let nothing hinder you. If there were seven hells between a soul and Christ it were worth while for it to force its way through all their fires to get at Him; for when you get at Him there is salvation and eternal life. Rest not, I pray you, till over all impediments you have forced a way. There is a plenitude of mercy about our Lord Jesus which will reward you for pressing towards Him. Oh, get to my Master, however far off you may be, for the sight of Him will well repay the weary journey. I delight to see the holy ingenuity of anxious minds when they are eager to find the Saviour: they will do anything to obtain salvation. I remember years ago when Bibles were not so common as they are now, a very, very poor man, who was impressed with his need of Christ, longed to read the Word of God, and therefore he went to a shop to ask the price of a second-hand Bible—the cheapest, the oldest they had on hand. “Ah,” said he, as he shook his head, “I have not money enough to buy it, but I will take great care of it if you will lend it to me from Saturday night till Monday morning: you won’t miss the sale of it, and I may read a part of it.” As soon as he gained the friendly loan he gave himself up to the precious book till the moment he had to return it, and so sought to find Christ. Ah, you have Bibles, some of you half-a-dozen of them, but you never look at them; the dust of the unread books condemns you; you take no trouble to reach the Saviour. God save you from this carelessness, and may you resolve to come to Jesus whoever may oppose. Be eager to listen to His gospel, though you may have far to go to hear it, and may have roughly squeezed in the crowd. When you hear the gospel, cry to the Lord God for His blessing upon it: though dark thoughts may gather, and Satan may try to thrust you back, be not removed from your purpose. Make a push for heaven and holiness. Never does the Lord work in any man a firm resolution to find the Saviour and yet allow him to perish.

One thing I want to call very particular attention to, it is this, these poor people came to Jesus with all their ailments about them. I know they did, because we read that they pressed upon Him to touch Him, and He made them whole. Now, suppose they had said, “We will not come till we are recovered,” then, of course, they needed not to come at all, and our Lord would have been a superfluity to them. But no: he that was blind came blind, he who was lame hobbled as best he could, and he who was palsied came shaking and trembling; but they did come. The poor people who had all sorts of dire complaints, even those who had devils in them, came just as they were. That is the point to which I would bring every man here who has not come to Christ: you are to come just as you are. Are you a drunkard? You have to give up the drink, but you must come to Him as you are to help you to give it up. Have you lived in uncleanness of life? Come and trust in Christ, unclean as you are: trust Him to make you pure. Have you been dishonest? Come to Him as dishonest, that He may make you honest. Do not attempt to make yourself fit for salvation, for it is clear that no one is so fit for saving as the lost, no one so fit for washing as the foul, no one so fit for healing as the sick. Come to the Saviour; come just as you are. Catch the spirit of the hymn,

“Come needy and guilty, come loathsome and bare,
You can’t come too filthy; come just as you are.”

If you think that it is needful to begin the work yourself, what is that but to insinuate that the Lord Jesus cannot do anything till you have started the work? Would you have it to be supposed that He is not quite up to the mark, and needs help from you? Is He so poor a Saviour that He is nothing till you enable Him to work? Think not so, but come along. You have heard what great things He has done; come, then, to Him even now, that the same great things may be wrought in you.

III. I will not say much upon the third point, which is THE RESULT. Of all that came to our Lord, multitudes though they were, not one was ever repulsed: no, not one. Since the world began has one soul been driven away from the Saviour’s door? Oh, tell ye it in Gath, publish it in the streets of Askelon, if ever Christ shall be found casting out a sinner, for then may the adversary justly rejoice over the defeat of the gospel. Let it ring down the corridors of hell, and let every devil dance for joy as he hears that Christ has broken His promise, and is untrue to His character, whenever you hear of one who comes to Him whom He casts out. I challenge all time; I challenge heaven, and earth, and hell, to bring a case in which my Lord and Master ever cast out a soul that put its trust in Him. It cannot be.

As none were repulsed, so all were healed; and even so all who now believe in Christ are healed of sin and its plagues. “Ah,” say objectors, “you preach faith as the way of salvation.” We confess the charge; and glory in it, since it is most true that it does save men. “But you ought to bid people do good works in order to salvation.” See here, good sir; if the people who believe in Christ do not perform good works, and if this faith does not make them moral, honest, sober, holy people, then we grant your point: but who shall assert that the doctrine of faith is other than purifying and sanctifying when we can bring multitudes of proofs that this very preaching up of faith and not of works is the most effective cause of virtue and holiness? Those who cry “Works, works, works,” have generally but a scanty supply of such wares. Remember the age of Laud and his popish preaching. Who were the followers of that theology but the libidinous cavaliers? Those who preached salvation by grace,—pray, who were they but the godliest men in the nation, the Puritans, against whom no man could bring any charge save that they were too sternly good, and kept the Sabbath too precisely, and walked before God with too much gravity? I wish the same fault could be found with us all. If that be vile, we purpose to be viler still.

“Talk we of morals, oh! thou bleeding lamb;
The grand morality is love of thee.”

How can this divine morality of love be wrought in us unless the Lord Jesus by His Holy Spirit bestows upon us a heart to trust Him, and to take Him and Him alone to be our salvation?

One thing I cannot help mentioning, and that is, as every one that came to Christ was healed, it followed that the attraction grew. Say there had been five hundred healed; then when the people came and a hundred more were benefited there were six hundred to draw; and the next day if there were a hundred more healed, there were seven hundred to attract others. Now, there never was a time since the world began when there were so many reasons for a sinner’s coming to Christ as there are this morning. Just think of it. Every soul whom the Lord has saved is another argument that He is able to save me. In reasoning philosophically, if we find a fact we put it down; but we do not dare to draw any inference from it, because an isolated fact cannot prove a general rule. When we get two or three dozen facts, we say, “The common inference from all these is so and so,” and a rule is proven. Suppose we could collect two or three hundreds of such facts, then we are sure. Now, for eighteen hundred years and more our Lord Jesus Christ has gone on saving sinners; and He has saved more sinners at this moment than ever before. Still they are coming, still they are coming, and still He is saving them, and every one of these is an argument that you should come. O my dear hearer, where are you—the man whom God means to bless under this sermon? Come at once and say, “I, too, will trust Him with my soul, for He has power to save me.” Then shall another be added to the long roll of His wonderful cures. The Lord grant it may be so, and His shall be the praise.

I desire now to spend a few minutes in real, hard, earnest work, in which may God the Holy Spirit help me, while I plead with those who have never come to Jesus, that they should come to Him at once. My dear hearer, if you have often heard about what Christ has done, and yet have never come to Him yourself that He might work a similar work of love in you, I pray you be not hindered any longer. First, come, because His very name invites you,—Jesus, a Saviour. You are sinful; but He has forgiveness. Come to Him. You will be well met, a sinner and a Saviour. Can two more congruous things come together? His name is Christ, too; that is, Anointed. Now, God has anointed Him with power to save, and commissioned Him to save, and He must and will discharge His high office by saving those who come to Him. It is His business to save, and you may be sure that He wears no empty title, and makes no vain pretence of being what He is not. Come along, then; come along to Him who is a real Saviour for real sinners. He is a Saviour commissioned of God, commit your soul’s business to His care. I say the name He bears rings out like a silver bell, and this is its note, “Come, and welcome! Come, and welcome, to Jesus Christ!”

Our Lord’s power should also encourage you to come to Him. Of that I have already spoken. Nothing has ever baffled Him. Stormy winds and raging waves obey Him; the very devils flee before Him. Come along with you. He is mighty to save; therefore come and hang the whole weight of your souls upon him.

Next, let His character allure you. There was never such a mass of love as Jesus is; He speaks no harsh word to coming sinners: He giveth them mercy liberally and upbraideth not. Hath He not said, “I will receive them graciously and love them freely”? Oh, come to Jesus. I am not calling you to Moses with the broken fragments of the law at his feet thundering in indignation; I invite you to Jesus with His pierced hands and open side entreating souls to come to Him.

Come to Jesus because God has made it His glory to pardon sinners. Constantine had a son whom he much loved, and he wished the nation to honour him; and so while his son was yet a child he caused him to sign pardons, and charters, so that all gracious acts of the king bore the prince’s signature. The Prince Emmanuel signs and seals divine pardons for the chief of sinners: and the great God in heaven loves that His Son should give pardon to sinners, for it endears Him to men and brings Him honour. Since it will honour Him to save you, come to Him and be not afraid.

Again, let me remind you of the preparations that are made for saving sinners. Christ has died to save them, He shed His blood to save them, and do you think He will have these preparations wasted? I smiled last night at a little incident in my own home. Three of our friends had been writing hard for me all day, and my wife expecting them to tea had spread the table bountifully, and adorned it with choice flowers. I came into the room and said, “They cannot stop to tea, for there is a meeting at the Orphanage, and they say they must hurry off.” I confess I felt sorry as I looked at the table and all its adornments. My own good wife replied, “No, no; they cannot go; they must have their tea. I cannot spread a table like this and nobody to come and eat. Go out and fetch in those highwaymen who want to run off: compel them to come in.” I fetched them in, and they were by no means loath to sit down and partake. It would have been a great disappointment to the kind hostess if no one had eaten what she had provided. This is a homely story, but it sets forth the need there is that our Lord’s provisions of grace should be used. He has spread a table, and He will have sinners come and feed at it. What did the king say who made a wedding-feast for his son? “Go out quickly into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in.” Thus the wedding was furnished with guests. Queer guests they were, and yet they furnished the feast with guests; they were odd bits of furniture, but they were needful; a wedding with a feast and nobody to eat it would be a dishonour to the king, so that guests were necessary furniture. Oh you that are furthest off from God, my Master’s mercy wants your misery that He may relieve it: He needs your emptiness that He may impart of His fulness, and grace for grace.

One thing more I have to say. I cannot tell if it will have power with anybody present, but I hope it may. I wish you would come to Jesus even for His servant’s sake. If I were a sculptor fashioning a statue I should feel that every stroke I took made a permanent impression, so that if I only wrought a little upon the hard stone I should make some progress, and my work would remain. Alas! my labour is not thus abiding in reference to some of you. I do my best each Sunday, but I am not much the forwarder, for you seem to be statues of ice, and the six week-days melt my one day’s work. It is weary work thus to labour in vain.

A painter takes his brush, and though he may be executing a very difficult portrait, yet every stroke tells, each tint and touch of colour denotes progress. Alas! I seem as if I wrote on the sand with some of you; the week’s tide obliterates the Sabbath’s marks. Am I always thus to weave in the pulpit that which is undone at home? You do not know how sadly we sometimes say to our Master, “Who hath believed our report, and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?” We would give anything to see our hearers converted, that our Master might have honour, and we are sad when men come not at our call. If we see no souls brought to the Redeemer’s feet we are ready to lie down and die. I read the other day of an old minister who had been some twenty years without a conversion, as far as he knew, and yet he was a really earnest man. At last, having much prayed over it, he announced that he should preach no more in that place, but resign his charge, and the reason he gave them with many tears was, “I am doing no good among you, there are no souls saved, and perhaps if another minister filled my place you might listen to his appeals. At any rate, I will not stand in the way of one who might be more useful, and so I bid you farewell.” As he went out an old woman named Sarah said, “O sir, you cannot go, for you were the means of leading me to Christ some three or four years ago.” “You,” he said, “Sarah, I thought you were one who did not care for my ministry.” “Oh, sir,” said she, “it has been my meat and drink.” “Woman,” said he, “why did you not tell me as much before? My heart has been breaking for you.” In the course of the week twenty or thirty came in to testify that they had sought and found the Saviour through his ministry. All he could do was to say, “Bless the Lord, I’ll not leave my post; but why did you not tell me of it before? O the sleepless nights I might have missed if you had but told me.” Some of you may have been saved, and yet you have never confessed the blessed fact, and I put it to you, whether you do well and kindly by His servant thus to rob him of his wages and keep back comforting news from his burdened heart.

However, that may pass. You who have not sought, and have not found, my Lord, what message shall I take home this morning to my Master when I go upstairs to speak with Him alone? Shall I tell Him you will not believe on Him? I set Him before you once again as able to save you, will you again refuse Him? Or shall the message be that you will trust in Him for salvation? God grant that you may give a wise reply for Jesus Christ’s sake. Amen.

Department of Philosophy, Practical Theology and Missions

“In what respects is the study of philosophical systems important for a theologian? First of all, philosophy has an historical interest for the divine. It is a fact, that philosophy has at all times exerted an influence on theology, particularly upon the dogmatic branch of it. A knowledge, then, of the philosophical systems, which have prevailed in former times, is essential to an accurate acquaintance with the theology of those times. The theological systems of the first period in the Christian era, were formed under the influence of Platonism; those of the Middle Ages were accommodated to the system of Aristotle; since the seventeenth century, the theories of Leibnitz and Wolf have modified theology; and it was again modified, at the close of the last century, by the peculiarities of Kant.

But it is not merely in an historical aspect, that philosophical study is of service to a theologian. It is also important in its connection with the dogmatic system. The educated theologian....is under a necessity of showing the consistency of his faith with philosophical truth, and of presenting it to his philosophizing contemporaries. If the prevalent philosophy contradict his faith, then a contest arises between the truth which is newly proposed to him, and that which he has already possessed. His creed and the prevailing scheme of philosophy measure themselves with each other in this strife. His faith rests on his inward experience, on that conviction which results from all that he has seen or felt, and at the same time on a firm historical basis. The true philosophical system will not contradict the principles which lie at the foundation of the Christian scheme.”

—Bibliotheca Sacra, February, 1844.

The Place Of Lament In The Christian Life

By Brian L. Webster and David R. Beach

[Brian L. Webster is Associate Professor of Old Testament Studies, Dallas Theological Seminary, and David R. Beach is Counselor, 4 Health Family Resource Center, Saranac, Michigan, and Adjunct Professor of Spiritual Formation, Cornerstone University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.]

“I wish the pathologists then would tell us what is the use of grief in the economy, and of what good it is the cause, proximate or remote.”—Thomas Jefferson to John Adams[1]

Lament As Response To Pain

When deep pain invades life, it demands a response. Some of life’s pains are deeper than others and therefore more difficult to respond to. For many Americans the attacks on September 11, 2001, were a mind-staggering event. Two landmarks of the New York City skyline crashed to the ground, killing thousands who had sought no conflict with their attackers. There were immediate responses at the site—attempts to escape the building’s collapse, emergency personnel implementing a disaster plan. Watching or hearing of it at a distance, many felt stunned. Meanwhile America’s enemies around the world responded with celebration. The aftermath required more than physical cleanup and the need to establish new national policies. A combination of questions and moans imposed themselves on people’s minds as they grappled to make sense of the events and mourn their losses.

Pain, loss, injustice, anxiety—these can lead to lament as a vehicle of response. Lament, however, is not limited to national disasters. Lament need not be kept in a vault to be retrieved and dusted off for events that occur only once in a decade or century. Lament in the Bible speaks of betrayal and abandonment, disappointment with God, injustice and enemy attacks, illness and death. It is both personal and corporate. Lament psalms are the most common type of psalms, which indicates that lament was voiced regularly.[2] But a survey of most hymnals shows a startling lack of hymns that express lament, a gap also noted in contemporary Christian music.

This dearth of expression of lament in Christian music contrasts with the fact that many books address the subject of pain. Two of C. S. Lewis’s works about pain illustrate this variety. A Grief Observed chronicles his experience and reflections on the loss of his wife,[3] while The Problem of Pain is an apologetic addressing the question of why a supremely loving and powerful God allows pain and suffering.[4]

Life’s deep pains include events, belief systems, emotional and relational processes and expressions, and hopefully some form of resolution. To a degree, discussions of pain touch on each of these, but they tend to focus on one or two. Some books focus on telling the story of someone’s particular pain or loss. They assist readers by inviting them along the same journey, to find expression for suffering vicariously and feel an eventual resolution.[5] Other works focus on the pains that stem from infertility, miscarriage, stillbirth, death of a child or spouse, divorce, abuse, physical injury, the holocaust, and others.[6] Still others approach pain in a more apologetic style. These books wrestle with important intellectual questions about pain in life. While striving to be relevant to real life, they are considerations made at more of a distance from pain, expressed in a philosophical discussion or a commentary on Job or Lamentations.[7] Another approach to processing pain is through expressing it or urging its expression in art, poetry, liturgy, or song.[8]

The lament psalms are some of ancient Israel’s expressions of responding to and processing pain. They are sung with emotion, and they also wrestle with intellectual issues in seeking a conversation with God. In a sense these songs are mislabeled, for the word “lament” too readily brings to mind the mourning associated with death. While these prayers may include a component of bemoaning personal distress, they are cries for help. As cries to God, biblical laments are a vehicle for responding to pain and approaching God. Given the importance of both processing pain and pursuing God, why has there been resistance to lament?

Resistance To Lament

A variety of reasons may discourage the use of lament. Cultural influences, relational styles, theological perspectives, and misunderstandings discourage the use of lament in the contemporary, Western, relatively wealthy church.

Cultural Influences

In the film The Green Beret John Wayne encounters a young Vietnamese boy whose surrogate soldier-father was killed in the jungle just before they were to fly back to the United States. The young boy, realizing his favorite soldier is dead, begins to weep. It is easy to wish that the Duke would scoop up the little boy and just hold him as he wails. But John Wayne’s line is a hardened, battle-weary Marine’s reply, “Be brave.” This is a strong influence for some— battlefield survival strategies. Other stories have strong, enduring influence as well, often played by hardened, bitter, vengeance-driven men. The common cultural view, that real men do not cry, crowds out room for biblical lament.

Years ago the jeremiad became part of the American way of dealing with catastrophe and suffering. The jeremiad is a sermon or similar work that accounts for sufferings as just retribution for great social and moral evils. While it may also express hope for change and a better future, the causal link between suffering and sin is intended to provoke anxiety and to exhort wrongdoers to change.[9] This is similar to witch-hunting and demon-chasing, in which the goal is to find the Achan in the camp or the Jonah on the ship, the assumption being that one person’s sin must be hindering the group’s “manifest destiny.” Whether it is John Wayne in The Green Beret, Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven, a jeremiad, or simply the comfortable numbness of watching news reports that tell of faraway horrors in brief prepackaged news bytes, cultural influences powerfully and often subtly shape and mold people’s responses to pain and suffering.

Relational Style(S)

Resistance to lament also flows out of relationships. Perhaps parents were actively or passively abusive and the child’s early objections were met with anger and shaming or what is often worse— silence. Perhaps the response was to internalize guilt and/or shame for having objections, for feeling hurt, or for expressing different opinions. As a result, hurt people may decide to avoid such conversations. They may think, “It’s not worth it; it won’t matter anyway. My experience isn’t important; it will just be met with disdain, contempt, or worse.” And so these people seek to avoid conflict.

Alternatively a struggle with an inner rage may lead to avoiding difficult conversations in order to maintain relationships.

Theological Short-Circuiting

Following the stillbirth of a son, a friend of one of the authors attempted to give encouragement by quoting Romans 8:28, “All things work together for good” (NKJV). Though the expression was sincere, it was out of place. The casual application of this verse and others stands among several theological or exegetical notions that would short-circuit the expression of lament. Whether these notions are a cause for disparaging lament or the symptom of another cause is not easy to discern. That is, do they arise first from an understanding of the passages, or do the passages simply provide an occasion for cultural influences to find expression in the thinking of the church? Such short-circuiting notions may stem from the ideas that “God has a plan,” that God is trying “to teach you something,” that “you need to have faith,” or “God is with us in everything.”

It is popular to memorize and take comfort in such verses as Joshua 1:5 in which God promised Joshua, “I will be with you, I will not fail you or forsake you.” Typically this both misinterprets what it means for God to be “with” someone and then presumes that God’s promise to Joshua transfers to everyone today. Less likely are people to cite Jeremiah 23:33, where the Lord declared, “I will abandon you.” Probably the same tendency to one-sidedness blocks consideration of verses like 2 Chronicles 15:2, “The Lord is with you when you are with Him. And if you seek Him, He will reveal Himself to you; but if you abandon Him, He will abandon you” (authors’ translation). And the same is true of the lament question in Psalm 22:1, “My God, my God, why have You abandoned me?” (authors’ translation). If “knowing” that “God is always with me” is the starting point, then the other verses get demoted to the status of being ignored or explained away. While contemporary culture may hold the phrase “God is with me” to mean some kind of existential experience, an abstract feeling of God’s presence, this is largely lacking in Scripture.[10]

In the Old Testament for God to be “with” someone meant to give him success in a task, often an assigned task, and may have also highlighted divine protection.[11] This is generally true in the New Testament as well. For example Jesus’ well-known words, “I am with you always, even to the end of the age” (Matt. 28:20), is in the context of a given task, the Great Commission.

God’s being with Joshua meant He would give him success in conquering the land. Thus the people began to know that God was with Joshua when he parted the Jordan River (Josh. 3:7). And when Jericho was destroyed, the narrator summed up the story with the words, “So the Lord was with Joshua” (6:27; italics added). Then when Israel lost to the forces of Ai, Joshua and the elders lamented (7:6–9), and the Lord said that He would not be with them anymore, unless or until they would carry out His command (7:12). So we see that God’s promise to be with Joshua did not preclude not being with Joshua, if the people were not with God. Similarly this accounts for David’s genuine concern in Psalm 51:11, “Do not cast me away from Your presence, and do not take Your Holy Spirit from me.” This was a plea that God not take away His support from David in his role as king, as He had with Saul.

The expectation of God’s presence is what led biblical characters and psalmists to ask where God is. The anticipation of God’s attentiveness led to the questions, “Why do You hide Your face,” and “How long until you listen?” But today it seems that the promise of God’s presence is used to smother these questions. Biblical lament is not without trust in God. Indeed most lament psalms include expressions of confidence in God. But that confidence prompts rather than precludes the expression of lament. Similarly one cannot get to Romans 8:28 without first passing through the groaning mentioned earlier in the chapter (vv. 22, 26).

This reveals the common misapplication of what it means to have faith in God. For many, “having faith” means mustering up the intestinal fortitude to put up with their circumstances, bolstered by the belief that God is with them and is working out a plan or trying to teach them something. Often that is simply a strategy for avoiding conflict. It may pressure people to be “tougher,” but it may not necessarily lead them to know God better. The psalms, expressing both confidence and lament, engender honest expression in hopes of finding mercy and grace in time of need. The lament psalms express real experiences of pain, not philosophical considerations of pain.

Feinberg discusses this distinction between the intellectual problem of evil and the religious problem of evil. “The religious problem of evil (the problem about one’s personal struggle with pain and suffering and how that affects one’s relation to God) is not primarily an intellectual problem. Instead, it is fundamentally an emotional one.. .. My problem. .. was about how in the midst of affliction I could find comfort and how I could find it in myself to live with this God who was not stopping the suffering.. .. At this point I understood that the religious problem of evil requires pastoral care rather than philosophical discussion.”[12]

In a chapter called “Recipes for Disaster, or How Not to Help the Afflicted,”[13] Feinberg addresses several improper responses to people in pain. Rather than succeeding in their intention to help, they represent a way of thinking that short-circuits lament by minimizing the legitimacy of feeling pain. The psalms of lament are for people in pain, to help them live with God.

Misunderstanding Providence And Theodicy

Hughes discusses the decline of lament in Christian thinking. As early as the sixth century B.C. the Greeks had passed laws restricting certain mourning activities in funeral processions, including the use of set lamentations.[14] Additional laws were passed in the following centuries, some of them referring specifically to women’s mourning practices. Seeing death as a natural end, Plato in the fourth century advised that funerals should take place three days after someone died, without extravagance and without lamentation.[15] He also criticized the poets for having male characters engage in demonstrative lamentation. According to Hughes, Plato’s “rejection of lamentation, as a form of negative femininity, exemplified by Achilles, survived in the influential critique of Greek lament by the Fathers of the Christian Church.”[16]

Hughes also notes that “of the Cappadocian Fathers, Gregory Nazianzen pioneered in developing the Christian funeral oration, which completely excluded lament,”[17] and among the Western church fathers, Ambrose (A.D. 339–397), in step with Plato, “clarified the appropriate attitudes in the face of death. Men should confront death in courage in the name of faith, nation, and justice; and excessive grief, as displayed particularly by women, is improper.”[18] In a similar vein Augustine felt guilty for feeling grief after losing his mother, leading Billman and Migliore to comment, “Grief. .. seems to be so aligned with inordinate carnal affections that sorrow over any worldly loss falls under suspicion.”[19]

“During the first four centuries of the Christian era, several Church Fathers formulated doctrines of providence as substitutes for Greek concepts of fate and lament.”[20] The doctrine of providence—which included elements of theodicy in wrestling with how a good God who is all-powerful can permit suffering and evil—developed into formulations that preclude lament, viewing such an activity as a sinful failure to recognize God’s sovereignty. For example Hughes argues that “Calvin’s doctrine of providence was promoted to arouse fear and humility in us toward God, to be courageous in the face of death, and to attain rest with tranquility. The doctrine was the culmination of a long theological tradition which rejected lament as a form of sin, from the Church Fathers through Thomas Aquinas to Luther. Calvin’s rigorous and comprehensive arguments for providence essentially prevented any further consideration of lament in theology.”[21]

Some theologians sought to make sense of God’s power, goodness, and foreknowledge. But in doing so they suppressed lament in various ways, and this conflicts with the Scriptures, which regularly legitimize lament. Lament dominates the psalms. God receives laments as parts of dialogues in the prophets. God Himself laments (e.g., Ps. 81:13–16). Jesus lamented. Even saints in heaven lament (Rev. 6:10). The view that providence precludes laments fails to correspond to the Scriptures.

Mischaracterizing Lament As Grumbling

One reason lament may be restrained is the lack of understanding of what it means to lament and specifically how it differs from grumbling and complaining, from rage or venting. The lament psalms, with their language of appeal to God, as well as the lament dialogues in the prophets show that lament is part of turning to God. That attitude clearly sets it apart from grumbling and complaining.

Misunderstanding The Old Testament And The Church Age

Other objections pertain to the relevance of the Old Testament and its relationship to the New Testament.[22]

One objection. Some may object to laments by arguing, “Hasn’t Jesus’ resurrection effectively eliminated the need for lament? Aren’t the Old Testament cries of anguish superseded, rendered unnecessary? Might they even be a sign of unbelief now that God has raised Jesus from the dead?”[23] Resner’s answer includes a helpful image. Just as the moon is often still visible in the morning sky, so the old age is still here—death is still present and believers are still waiting for its destruction.

Another objection. “But isn’t the act of lament an act of raising questions for which born-again believers now have the answer? In Christ isn’t there an answer for every lament?”[24] Yes, there is an answer in Christ for every question, but these questions must be faced by Jesus’ followers. No one of the four Gospels opens by saying, “Now here is the good news of Jesus Christ, ‘The stone was rolled away, He rose from the dead, and He is coming again.’ So there you have it.” The Gospels record the fact that Jesus was rejected by many of His own people and was then crucified. According to Resner, “The good news is only good news because the bad news has seeped into every fiber of our being.”[25] And to those who find only answers Wiesel says, “Man raises himself toward God by the questions he asks Him. That is the true dialogue.”[26] Also, “There is a certain power in the question which isn’t found in the answer. It is the power of the question that the lament explores.”[27]

A third objection. Others may say, “But if Jesus’ followers really believed in His resurrection, if they really believed in the power of God to overcome evil, and provide joy and comfort in His Spirit, then the lament wouldn’t be needed. Maybe laments are for those who can’t really believe as they ought.” (This is similar to the first objection, which views lament as an absence of faith, except that this objection contends that lament shows lack of enough faith).

Grief over loss—the painful absence not only of a person but also of a relationship—also involves pain in waiting, waiting for a time in the future when everything will be righted. And during the waiting, someone or something is absent.

Many biblical laments cry out to God, “Why, Lord?” and “How long, O Lord?” These questions introduce many of the laments. Death is not gone. Sin is still present. Creation is not at rest. In fact God Himself has subjected the whole creation to frustration. “We know that all creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. Not only so, but we ourselves who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies” (Rom. 8:22–23, NIV, italics added). When John wrote, “Come, Lord Jesus” (Rev. 22:20), he was virtually joining all creation in asking, “Why do You linger? How long must death and sin be among us?”

The Legitimacy Of Lament

In contrast to the objection that the Cross eliminates the need for lament, it actually demonstrates and invites lament. The cry “My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?” is not the only part that Psalm 22 plays in the Gospel narratives. Matthew and Mark allude to other parts of the psalm in explaining Jesus’ passion.[28] Johnson details the parallels between this psalm and the Gospels to demonstrate that Mark invoked the entire psalm to make his theological point that Jesus cried out to God for deliverance in agony but not in despair.[29] “Jesus, in lifting up the lament from Psalm 22, is situating himself directly within that long line of servants who have suffered unjustly for God.”[30] In that place we are in solidarity with Christ. And “it is precisely because God hears Jesus’ cry that our cries also are heard.”[31] Since Christians suffer, is not Christ’s lament a model for the members of His church? It is a model that persists from the cross to Revelation 6:10, where the saints who have died and gone to heaven are lamenting. “Living in the mystery of Jesus’ cry, then, means to allow both the question—real and harrowing as it is—and the answer—truly an answer but also an eschatological one—to play their necessary and legitimate roles. It is only by living in the experiential gap between question and answer, between promise and fulfillment, that we can truly embrace the cry rather than squelch it.”[32]

Believers fellowship with Christ and have His character built within them not just in suffering, but also in lament.

Suggested Uses For Lament

Pastoral Counseling

Billman and Migliore assert that the life of faith is supported by prayers of lament through their offering a needed language of pain, granting permission to grieve and protest, challenging inadequate understandings of God, preparing the way for new understandings of God, purifying anger and the desire for vengeance, increasing solidarity with those who suffer, and revitalizing praise and hope.[33] Lament is “the language of the painful incongruity between lived experience and the promises of God.”[34] These elements often become issues for pastoral counseling. Rather than a philosophical discussion of suffering or some quick answer, using lament in pastoral counseling honors the process in moving through one’s own suffering.

Journaling

The many laments in the Psalter testify to their intent for repeated use. These psalms often use general terms so that worshipers can pray the same prayers, filling in details of their own circumstances as they approach God. These psalms may refer to enemies, illness, or sins, but individual petitioners today can use the same words to refer to their own particular adversaries, afflictions, or wrongs.

Viewing the psalms as adaptable to the particular situations of present-day petitioners implies an invitation. It is as if God is saying, “It is all right to talk to Me in this way, and I want to have a relationship with you that is based on your freedom to express your concerns.” Journaling is a way of voicing cries for help that are commonly called lament. Journaling involves both reflection and expression. The process invites those uncomfortable with verbal conflict to let go of their fears of retribution gently. It eases them at their own pace into a more robust spirituality.

Card has encouraged believers to offer lament as an act of worship and to journal those laments. He includes Job, David, Jeremiah, and Jesus as examples of lamenters.[35] In A Sacred Sorrow: The Experience Guide he offers ten weeks of reflections. On the fifth day of each week he invites his readers to compose their own laments as they reflect on the material for the preceding four days of that week.[36] Though his books are primarily a call to revive lament and not instruction in the form of lament prayers, his invitation to journaling laments is a welcome one.

Prayer

As prayers, the lament psalms are pleas for help because the psalmists were turning to God in their reactions to pain. For believers to voice laments in prayer most effectively, they should keep several parameters in mind. First, it is legitimate to voice pain. Second, it is important to be aware of the often unhealthy ways people react to pain. Third, proper lament should be distinguished from grumbling and complaining as well as from cathartic venting. Fourth, it is helpful to have an understanding of what elements make up lament psalms and how believers can employ those elements in their own life situation.

Confession

Many but not all biblical laments include confession of sin. As the psalmists turned to God, their self-examination often led to their confessing sins. In addition other lament psalms include protestations of innocence. Revealing the seriousness of sin, the psalmists used words that safeguarded them from casually assuming forgiveness. Though forgiveness is free, it was not viewed lightly.

Further, the communal lament psalms teach readers to stand in a community, not only sharing or sympathizing in the community’s pain, but also identifying themselves with its sins. Nehemiah confessed sins of the community which he himself had not committed but which he mourned (Neh. 1:5–7), and Daniel did the same (Dan. 9:5–19). Confessing community sins can spur members to participate in helping establish righteousness and justice in the community. The individualistic nature of American culture tends to discourage such an approach, but corporate confession can confront individuals with potential complicity. It is not necessary to have had ancestors who owned slaves to confess the sins of one’s forebears and to be persuaded of the need to help establish justice in response to continuing marks of those sins in one’s community.

Reconciliation

Reconciliation demands a forum for dialogue that allows both victims and perpetrators to tell what happened during conflicts. That dialogue often includes some of the basic elements of lament psalms: address, lament, turning to the other, and petition. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa has set a pattern now being followed around the world in war-torn areas—Argentina, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chile, East Timor, El Salvador, Fiji, Ghana, Guatemala, Liberia, Morocco, Panama, Peru, Sierra Leone, and even the city of Greensboro, North Carolina. Nancy Lee, a Fulbright scholar who has studied postwar Croatian society, states, “In the absence of lament, the status quo is more likely to remain.”[37] She adds,

Unexpressed lament and unresolved anger and grief may contribute to the current social interactions in the former Yugoslavia. Pain over atrocities committed long ago is cherished as desire for revenge rather than expressed before God, who is believed to be capable of alleviating the suffering. Witness the absence of worldwide prophetic critique of what has been going on in the former Yugoslavia in recent years.. .. Lament speech assumes that the power to find lasting solutions to a social crisis resides within a people through their liturgical conversation with the divinity, and not outside this framework where the solution is simply for humans to rid society of their nemesis through long-standing tribal conflicts.[38]

Lee names a vital resource for these national crises—the churches and their liturgies.

Liturgy

The Center for Action and Contemplation has created on online template for a liturgy of lament. “The basic premise for a Liturgy of Lament is to provide a space—a safe and sacred place to lament—for those who are suffering and those who stand with the suffering.”[39] The template is simple and easily adapted to different groups. It includes reading Scripture to prepare for lament, to express communal lament, and to conclude the service. It also includes music and opportunities for individual expression.[40] “Liturgy, and particularly the liturgy of lament, has the power to reshape the larger world.. .. Lament speech is not only a response to suffering but holds the power to shape society and history by nonviolently combating destructive social forces before they wreak total havoc.”[41]

Lament As Part Of Spiritual Formation

Pursuit Of Truth

Jesus’s quotation of Old Testament verses encourages His followers to enter their own “present” moments unafraid of their own questions. Rather than following Jesus’ model, people are often shaped by memories of conversations in which they have allowed others to shape them with fear, shame, or doubt. The lamenter may need to learn to trust God and not be defensive, abusive, or contemptuous.

Instead of avoiding conflict Jesus often pursued truth through powerful questions. For example in John 18 He asked six questions: “Who is it you want?” (vv. 4, 7, NIV). “Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?” (v. 11, NIV). “Why question me? Ask those who heard me. Surely they know what I said” (v. 21, NIV). “If I said something wrong. .. testify as to what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth, why did you strike me?” (v. 23, NIV). “Is that your own idea, or did others talk to you about me?” (v. 34, NIV). These questions passionately pursue the truth for the sake of others. “Everyone on the side of truth listens to me,” Jesus said (v. 37, NIV). Biblical lament is also a fierce pursuit of truth with powerful questions—a way of joining Him in pursuing the truth.

Bearing Witness

In 1993 Carolyn Forche published the largest anthology of “poetry of witness” to date.[42] A collection of writings produced in life’s extremities, this book presents another function of lament—bearing witness. Armenian genocide, Bosnia, the Shoa, Vietnam—these and others are the crucibles out of which poetry of witness emerges. Israel has certainly had its share of suffering and its poets—David, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea, to name a few—have written an inner witness that connects generations of their descendants to Israel’s tragedies. Perhaps resistance to lament indicates an unwillingness to bear witness to God on behalf of and in solidarity with humanity. Perhaps by overemphasizing “bearing witness” to humanity on behalf of God, the church has neglected a concern of the heart of Christ—interceding to the Father for the world.

Pursuit Of Relationship

Through lament, the one praying engages in relational conflict in order to pursue relational depth—choosing full disclosure and honesty which opens up possibilities for intimacy that otherwise would not exist.

Lament As Part Of Life

After the death of his son and after writing of his grief in Lament for a Son, Wolterstorff presents a compelling case for lament as part of life. He maintains that like poles on the globe, praise and lament orient the life of the believer. Both are essential in the life of faith, since life involves joys and sorrows, celebration and suffering, praise and lament. “Lamentation is the language of suffering and the praise of God is the language of joy.”[43] It is impossible to appreciate one without the other. Each extreme demands walking on the edge of language, the edge of human experience, employing rich imagery to describe the indescribable. Wolterstorff opines, “It’s an illusion to suppose or to postulate that there could ever be a relationship with God in which there was only praise and never lamentation.”[44] In critiquing Western culture in its attempts to “disown” grief, he comments that “owning one’s grief bumps head up against a fundamental feature in our modern Western attitude toward the world; this attitude, ‘If you don’t like it, change it. Instead of coping, conquer. If you don’t like hot weather, get an air conditioner. If you don’t like your headache, take an aspirin. If you don’t like that hill over there, get a bulldozer. If you don’t like what’s going on in Washington, throw the bums out.’ All of this because to own your grief is to admit failure, to admit vulnerability—that you weren’t in control of everything.”[45]

Pursuit Of Christlikeness

The most important reason for learning lament and letting it become an integral part of life is that Christ lived it, prayed it, and embodied it. Along with praise, lament was part of His conversations with His Father. “In the days of His flesh, He offered up both prayers and supplications with loud crying and tears to the One able to save Him from death, and He was heard because of His piety. Although He was a Son, He learned obedience from the things which He suffered” (Heb. 5:7–8). Refusing to learn lament is refusing to follow Christ’s example. Pursuing the image of Christ means learning to pray as He did, to love as He did, to join in solidarity with a lost and dying world by crying out on their behalf as well as for the petitioner’s own suffering.

Conclusion

Thomas Jefferson had at least two opportunities to write an emancipation proclamation for slaves. At least twice he declined for political expediency (and perhaps personal political ends, not to mention the fact that his own slaves maintained his private residence at Monticello while he was away in Philadelphia and later Washington). Not until more than sixty years later would freedom come to slaves, not until another president came who had suffered like a slave under his own father, a president who had taken lament into his soul—lament for his own grief and for others. Understanding something of the use of grief, Abraham Lincoln accomplished with much bloodshed what Jefferson might have accomplished with the stroke of his pen. Of what use is grief? Jefferson asked. For believers it means following and standing with the suffering Messiah, the slaughtered Lamb, for a suffering world. For love’s sake. That is the use of grief. That is also a use of lament.

Notes

  1. Lester J. Cappon, ed., The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1988), 467 (italics his).
  2. Hermann Gunkel first classified psalms in genres, identifying thirty-nine psalms as individual laments or “complaint psalms”—3, 5, 6, 7, 13, 17, 22, 25, 26, 27:7–14, 28, 31, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 63, 64, 69, 70, 71, 86, 88, 102, 109, 120, 130, 140, 141, 142, 143—as well as other sections belonging to “liturgies and mixed genres” (Introduction to Psalms: The Genres of the Religious Lyric of Israel, trans. James D. Nogalski [Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1998], 121). He also cited several communal “complaint psalms”—44, 58, 74, 79, 80, 83, 106, 125—as well as several from “liturgies, mixed genres and reworkings” (ibid., 82). While there is no consensus on the classification of all the psalms, over a third of the Psalter is composed of the genre often called lament.
  3. C. S. Lewis, A Grief Observed (New York: Seabury, 1961).
  4. C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain (New York: Macmillan, 1944).
  5. Examples of books that process pain in a journaling style include Nicholas Wolterstorff, Lament for a Son (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987); Merton P. Strommen and A. Irene Strommen, Five Cries of Grief: One Family’s Journey to Healing after the Tragic Death of a Son (Minneapolis: Augsburg/Fortress, 1996); John S. Feinberg, Deceived by God? A Journey through Suffering (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1997); J. I. Packer, A Grief Sanctified: Through Sorrow to Eternal Hope: Including Richard Baxter’s Timeless Memoir of His Wife’s Life and Death (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2002); Nancy Guthrie, Holding on to Hope (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 2004); Carol Kent, When I Lay My Isaac Down: Unshakeable Faith in Unthinkable Circumstances (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2004); and Jerry Sittser, A Grace Disguised: How the Soul Grows through Loss (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005).
  6. Two examples are Dan Allender, The Wounded Heart: Hope for Adult Victims of Sexual Abuse (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1995); and Steven Tracy, Mending the Soul: Understanding and Healing Abuse (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005).
  7. Philip Yancey, Disappointment with God: Three Questions No One Asks Aloud (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1988); James Dobson, When God Doesn’t Make Sense (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 1997); Philip Yancey, Where Is God When It Hurts? (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997); Gary Poole, How Could God Allow Suffering and Evil? (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997); D. A. Carson, How Long, O Lord?: Reflections on Suffering and Evil (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006); Stanley Hauerwas, Naming the Silences: God, Medicine, and the Problem of Pain (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990); Gustavo Gutiérrez, On Job: God-Talk and the Suffering of the Innocent (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1987); and Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Grief and Pain in the Plan of God: Christian Assurance and the Message of Lamentations (Fearn, Scotland: Christian Focus, 2004).
  8. Ann Weems, Psalms of Lament (Louisville: John Knox, 1995), includes fifty contemporary poems written in the wake of her son’s killing. This is a nonjournaling example of putting pain into words. Calls for lament include Kathleen D. Billman and Daniel L. Migliore, Rachel’s Cry: Prayer of Lament and Rebirth of Hope (Cleveland: United Church, 1999); Sally A. Brown and Patrick D. Miller, eds., Lament: Reclaiming Practices in Pulpit, Pew, and Public Square (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005); Michael Card, A Sacred Sorrow: Reaching Out to God in the Lost Language of Lament (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2005); and idem, A Sacred Sorrow: The Experience Guide (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2005).
  9. Donna Campbell, “Forms of Puritan Rhetoric: The Jeremiad and the Conversion Narrative;” http://www.wsu.edu/~campbelld/amlit/jeremiad.htm (accessed July 30, 2007).
  10. Besides the presence of Christ and the role of the Holy Spirit in the New Testament, God’s presence is presented in several ways in the Old Testament. In theopanies God’s presence was temporarily manifested at certain locations and then God left. God’s presence was also specially associated with certain locations, such as the temple in Jerusalem, or objects such as the ark of the covenant. Elsewhere God is omniperceptive (aware of everywhere), a category that gets taken up into the relatively infrequent motif of omnipresence. The passages pertinent to our concerns are those in which God is with someone (indicated by the preposition עִם or אֶת) or near them. See Brian L. Webster, “Divine Abandonment in the Hebrew Bible” (Ph.D. diss., Hebrew Union College, 2000), 193–220.
  11. Ibid., 211–12.
  12. Feinberg, Deceived by God? A Journey through Suffering, 34–35.
  13. Ibid., 37–58.
  14. Richard Hughes, Lament, Death, and Destiny (New York: Peter Lang, 2004), 18. Plutarch is the source for Solon’s law in Athens in the early sixth century B.C.
  15. Ibid., 18–19.
  16. Ibid., 19.
  17. Ibid., 76.
  18. Ibid.
  19. Billman and Migliore, Rachel’s Cry: Prayer of Lament and Rebirth of Hope, 50.
  20. Hughes, Lament, Death, and Destiny, 81.
  21. Ibid., 113. Though Hughes’s comments here may be overgeneralizations, it is important to note that antilament sentiments were present in the writings of some theologians of the past. These comments have contributed to a negative view of lament by the church despite the fact that those same theologians sometimes expressed other perspectives in their works.
  22. Andre Resner Jr., “Lament: Faith’s Response to Loss,” Restoration Quarterly (1990): 129–42.
  23. Ibid., 129–30 (italics his).
  24. Ibid., 130 (italics his).
  25. Ibid., 131.
  26. Elie Wiesel, Night (New York: Hill & Wang, 1960), 15.
  27. Resner, “Lament: Faith’s Response to Loss,” 130–31, paraphrasing Wiesel, Night.
  28. William Stacy Johnson, “Jesus’ Cry, God’s Cry, and Ours,” in Lament: Reclaiming Practices in Pulpit, Pew, and Public Square, 81. Johnson shows that the deliverance recorded in Psalm 22 applies to Jesus as well. Thus neither the psalmist nor Jesus was totally forsaken.
  29. Johnson, “Jesus’ Cry, God’s Cry, and Ours,” 84, 86.
  30. Ibid., 84.
  31. Ibid., 86.
  32. Ibid., 88.
  33. Billman and Migliore, Rachel’s Cry: Prayer of Lament and Rebirth of Hope, 103–27.
  34. Ibid., 107.
  35. Card, A Sacred Sorrow: Reaching out to God in the Lost Language of Lament.
  36. Card, A Sacred Sorrow: The Experience Guide. See Brian L. Webster and David R. Beach, “Review of A Sacred Sorrow and A Sacred Sorrow: The Experience Guide,” Bibliotheca Sacra 163 (October–December 2006): 496–97.
  37. Nancy Lee, cited by Deborah deBoer, “Can Songs of Lament Change the World? Union’s Fulbright Fellow Looks for Answers in Croatia” (accessed July 31, 2007)
  38. Ibid.
  39. “Liturgy of Lament Template” http://cacradicalgrace.org/getconnected/Liturgy-%20of%20Lament%20Template.pdf (accessed July 31, 2007)
  40. Ibid.
  41. deBoer, “Can Songs of Lament Change the World?”
  42. Carolyn Forche, ed., Against Forgetting: Twentieth Century Poetry of Witness (New York: Norton, 1993). In the introduction Forche says this work is “the result of a thirteen-year-effort to understand the impress of extremity on the poetic imagination” (ibid., 30).
  43. Nicholas Wolterstorff, “Lament as Part of Life,” videotape, Calvin College Video Productions (Grand Rapids: Calvin Productions, 1996).
  44. Ibid.
  45. Ibid.

Facing a Tolerant World with Intolerant Truth (Selected Scriptures)

Friday 10 March 2023

The Significance Of Jesus’ Raising Lazarus From The Dead In John 11

By Stephen S. Kim

[Stephen S. Kim is Professor of Bible, Multnomah Biblical Seminary, Portland, Oregon.]

The fourth Gospel aims to present Jesus as the promised Messiah and the divine Son of God, so that His disciples may believe (or continue to believe) in Him and have eternal life (cf. 20:30-31). And the means by which John revealed Jesus as the divine Messiah is the seven sign-miracles[1] and their attendant contexts, all of which are recorded in the Book of Signs (chaps. 2-13).[2] While the Book of Signs presents the case that Jesus is indeed the promised Christ and the divine Son, the “Book of Glory” (chaps. 13-20) confirms the claims made in the earlier chapters about Him.

The Book of Signs has two major sections following the introductory Prologue (1:1-18) and Testimonium (1:19-51): the Cana Cycle (chaps. 2-4) and the Festival Cycle (chaps. 5-12). The first two sign-miracles, both performed in Cana of Galilee, form a literary bracket around chapters 2-4.[3] The remaining sign-miracles are displayed in the context of Jewish festivals.[4] While the Festival Cycle is generally outlined to include chapters 5-12, it is possible to separate chapters 5-10 from 11-12.[5] Though chapters 11-12 are technically still part of the Festival Cycle, in a sense they move the key themes developed in chapters 5-10 to their climax. For instance the theme of presenting Jesus as the divine Messiah who grants life reached a climactic point in His raising of Lazarus, and the theme of opposition to the One who offers that life also reached a climactic point in the enemies’ decision to kill Him. Therefore these two chapters serve as both a climax to the sign-miracles in the Book of Signs and as a transition to the “Book of Glory.”

This article examines Jesus’ seventh and climactic sign-miracle, namely, His raising of Lazarus from the dead (11:1-44). Whereas the first sign-miracle of Jesus’ turning of water into wine serves as the representative sign among the seven sign-miracles, raising Lazarus is the climactic sign.

The Miracle Of Raising Lazarus From The Dead

As the seventh and climactic sign of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel, this miracle completes the selected Johannine signs that present Jesus as the promised Messiah and the Son of God. If the first miracle of Jesus turning water into wine in Cana is the first or representative one among the signs (ἀρχὴν τῶν σημείων, 2:11), then this miracle of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead is the seventh and climactic sign in revealing His person.[6] The miraculous raising of Lazarus from the dead climactically confirms Jesus’ authority to give life (5:21) and to resurrect the dead (5:28-29). It also demonstrates His claim to be “the resurrection and the life” (11:25).[7]

The Setting

This miracle took place in the context following the Jewish Feast of Dedication (10:22-42) and preceding the Passover of Jesus’ death (chaps. 12-20). The temporal indication “Then came” (᾿Εγένετο τότε) in 10:22 seems to support the point that the events of 10:22-42 took place sometime after the events of 7:1-10:21. The events of chapters 7-10 describe the occurrences during the Feast of Tabernacles, while the events of 10:22-42 describe the Feast of Dedication.[8] Three months may have passed between the two festivals.[9] While at first glance the Feast of Dedication may seem to have little to do with Jesus’ miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead, the messianic expectations involved in the festival may point to Jesus’ actions and the Evangelist’s decision to place the narrative here.

The Feast of Dedication (also known as Hanukkah) commemorated the cleansing and rededication of the temple by Judas Maccabeus in 164 B.C. after it had been defiled by Antiochus IV (1 Macc. 1:10-67; 4:41-61; 2 Macc 6-7).[10] Because the festival was celebrated with lamps in the temple, synagogue, and homes, it came to be known as the “Feast of Lights.”[11] The celebration represented the deliverance and freedom of God’s people. Borchert explains the background of the feast in the context of John 10.

I believe chap. 10 represents a new theme that builds upon the inadequacy of the Jewish leadership and the rejection of Jesus’ messianic calling evident throughout the Tabernacles section of John (chaps. 7-9). But the Festival of Dedication (which is the focus of chap. 10) also has a messianic aspect because that festival had been celebrated as a memorial to the rejection of false rulers, epitomized by Antiochus IV (Epiphanes), who among other things desecrated the temple by slaughtering a pig on the altar of sacrifice and also erected a statue of Zeus (Jupiter) in the most holy place, the inner sanctuary of the temple. The subsequent victory and expulsion of the Syrians from Israel in 164 B.C. under Judas Maccabeus and the accompanying reconsecration of the temple was thereafter established in the Jewish calendar as a national religious freedom festival, which at that time definitely implied messianic expectations.[12]

The background behind the Feast of Dedication explains the Jews’ skeptical question to Jesus, “How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly” (10:24). The Jews were rejecting Jesus because while He was claiming to be the Messiah; He was not measuring up to their great “Maccabean-style” deliverer expectations.[13] Jesus’ talk of sheep and eternal life must have baffled the people. But Jesus was showing that the true messianic deliverance is spiritual rather than political. As the Messiah, Jesus offers eternal life to those who believe in His name. And He was able to offer them eternal life because He would soon go to Jerusalem for the Passover, where He would vicariously offer up His life as the Passover Lamb for the forgiveness of sins. As the Good Shepherd Jesus must give His life for the sheep (vv. 11, 15).

The Feast of Dedication (vv. 22-42) also provides the context for Jesus’ “hour” drawing near. As it drew near, opinions about Jesus grew further and further apart. On the one hand the religious leaders in Jerusalem cemented their hatred of Jesus by trying to stone Him because He claimed to be the divine Son (vv. 30-39). On the other hand many people on the other side of the Jordan placed their faith in Jesus (vv. 40-42). This growing polarization of opinions provided the setting for Jesus’ miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead (chap. 11). And this miracle provided the ultimate basis for faith and at the same time the ultimate cause for unbelief and eventually murder.

The Sign

Jesus’ raising Lazarus is recorded in a lengthy narrative. This chapter can be divided as follows: introduction (vv. 1-6); Jesus’ dialogue with the disciples (vv. 7-16); Jesus’ dialogue with Martha (vv. 17-27); Jesus’ dialogue with Mary and the mourners (vv. 28-37); Jesus’ miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead (vv. 38-44); the responses to Jesus’ miracle (vv. 45-54); Jesus’ Passover pilgrimage (vv. 55-57). In a typical form of a Johannine sign this miracle is also accompanied by Jesus’ interpretation of its meaning, but with one exception. While the miracles in John 5, 6, and 9 are followed by Jesus’ discourses in interpreting the signs, here the meaning is discussed before the miracle.[14]

The story begins with the grim situation in the home of Jesus’ three loved ones. Lazarus was sick (v. 1). Apparently the siblings knew Jesus well (cf. Luke 10:38-42). So the sisters asked Jesus to come and heal their brother: “Lord, the one you love is sick” (John 11:3).[15] Jesus assured them with this enigmatic statement, “This sickness will not end in death. No, it is for God’s glory so that God’s Son may be glorified through it” (v. 4). Like many other Johannine sayings, this statement has a dual meaning.[16] In one sense Jesus gave the assurance that Lazarus’s sickness would not be the end of the story, for he would be raised and the miracle would reveal Jesus’ glory. In another sense these events led inevitably to Jesus’ death, and His being glorified by the Father. Jesus loved Lazarus (v. 5), and yet He waited two days before going to Lazarus (v. 6). “The delay indicates that Jesus was operating by a divine plan and according to a divine timetable.”[17] “This enigmatic response continues the pattern of Jesus rebuffing requests and acting only in response to the Father’s direction (cf. 2:4; 7:3-10).”[18]

Having waited two days until Lazarus died, Jesus led the disciples to the place where he lay dead (v. 7). Songer perceptively characterizes Jesus’ decision to go back to Judea as, “a journey to give life to Lazarus, but a march of death for Him.”[19] The disciples tried to deter Him from going because they knew the danger awaiting Him there. “But Rabbi, a short while ago the Jews tried to stone you, and yet you are going back there?” (v. 8). Jesus answered His disciples with another enigmatic statement: “Are there not twelve hours of daylight? A man who walks by day will not stumble, for he sees by this world’s light. It is when he walks by night that he stumbles, for he has no light” (vv. 9-10). Tenney is correct in saying that “Jesus felt assured of safety while pursuing the course defined for Him by the will of God.”[20] In other words His death would be voluntary and it would happen according to the Father’s set time. Jesus’ conversation with His disciples also reveals that the purpose of Jesus’ delay was twofold: first, to reveal His glory as the One who has authority over life and death; and second, to instruct and develop faith in the disciples, including Mary and Martha (vv. 11-16).

The opening verses of the narrative and Jesus’ discussion with the disciples present the occasion and purpose for the miracle (vv. 1-16), and His discussion with Martha reveals the nature and theology of the miracle (vv. 17-27). Verse 17 states explicitly that Lazarus had been dead for four days (v. 17). By waiting till then Jesus made certain that there could not be a shadow of doubt about His miracle.[21] Knowing that Jesus could have come in time to save Lazarus, Martha questioned why He delayed (vv. 18-22). When Jesus assured her that her brother would rise again, those words gave her little comfort because she thought Jesus was referring to the eschatological resurrection (vv. 23-24).[22] While it is true that there will be a resurrection in the future, Jesus wanted Martha to know that as the Messiah and the Son of God, He has authority over life and death. Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?” (vv. 25-26).[23] Songer correctly interprets this statement: “The dead who believe in Jesus will rise, and the living who believe will never die spiritually.”[24] Dodd paraphrases Jesus’ answer in this way: “I am the resurrection: he who has faith in me, even if he dies, will live again. I am the life: he who is alive and has faith in me will never die.”[25] Jesus was reiterating the truth He had been teaching all along, namely, that eternal life begins here and now, and those who believe in Him already have that life. Martha’s response reflects her conviction: “Yes, Lord; I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who was to come into the world” (v. 27).[26] She believed in Jesus even before seeing the miracle.

Jesus’ discussion with Martha reveals the nature of the miracle and His divine authority over life and death, and His discussion with Mary also reveals His humanity (vv. 28-37). Jesus was “deeply moved in spirit and troubled” (v. 33). Jesus even wept (v. 35), so that those around Him said, “See how he loved Lazarus” (v. 36). These verses reveal the tenderness of Jesus’ heart, and that must have ministered to Mary deeply to know that Jesus had not only the power and authority over life and death, but that as the Good Shepherd He also cared for her. Jesus’ display of His love and compassion also sets the stage for His miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead.

The account of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead is recorded in only a few verses (vv. 38-44). Like the other miracles of Jesus, only the simple command of His word was needed to raise Lazarus, who had been dead for four days. As the Messiah, Jesus spoke with power and authority (cf. 2:7; 4:50; 5:8). When Jesus called Lazarus by name (v. 43), He was fulfilling His role as the Good Shepherd who calls His sheep by name (cf. 10:3).[27] Jesus also said, “My sheep hear my voice . . . and I give them eternal life, and they will never perish” (vv. 27-28). This miracle contributes to a central theme that has been developed throughout these chapters, namely, that Jesus is the life-giving Son of God.

The closing verses of this chapter describe the aftermath of Jesus’ climactic miracle (vv. 45-57). As a result of the sign some believed in Jesus, while others rejected Him with skepticism and unbelief. Some of the people even reported Jesus’ miracle to the religious authorities. The unbelief of the Jewish religious leaders reached its climax at this point. The Sanhedrin convened and decided to put an end to Jesus’ life. Caiaphas’s judgment to sacrifice Jesus’ life for the good of the nation ironically predicted the kind of death Jesus would soon die (vv. 49-53). The following verses describe Jesus’ final Passover pilgrimage up to Jerusalem (vv. 54-57). The “hour” when Jesus, the “Passover Lamb” (1 Cor. 5:7), would be sacrificed had finally come. He would give Himself voluntarily and vicariously. He gave His life so that others could live through Him. As the “Lamb of God” He will take away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and His sacrificial death would prove true to His claim: “I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep” (10:11).

The Significance

The significance of this miracle is indicated by the fact that it is the seventh sign among the Johannine miracles. As the seventh sign, it is both completing and climactic. It is completing in that these seven miracles were specifically chosen by John to present Jesus as the Messiah and the Son of God. It is climactic in that this miracle of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead brings to a climax a theme that has been building throughout the miracles and their attendant contexts, namely, that Jesus has the authority to give eternal life to those who believe in Him (5:22; 14:6).

The seventh sign is also climactic in that this miracle brought the people’s opinions and responses to a decisive point. For those who sought to believe, this miracle provided the ultimate evidence for faith in Jesus as the promised Messiah and the divine Son of God (11:27; cf. 20:30-31). But for those who persisted in unbelief, this miracle gave the ultimate grounds for rejecting Jesus. The degree of opposition to Jesus had increased to the point that the religious leaders decided resolutely to take His life.

Also this miracle gives hope beyond this life. In raising Lazarus from the dead, Jesus demonstrated His authority to reverse the effects of sin and death (cf. Gen. 2:17; Rom. 5:12).[28] And by His death and resurrection Jesus offers forgiveness of sins and life. Tenney eloquently explains that this miracle of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead, “declared Him to be the Master of man’s last and most implacable enemy, death.”[29]

This miracle therefore has profound messianic and eschatological implications. Old Testament saints expressed their confidence in the Messiah’s forthcoming kingdom (Ps. 16:9-11; Isa. 26:19-20; Dan. 12:2).[30] Even Martha professed her belief in the eschatological resurrection: “I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day” (John 11:24). Her faith in the eschatological resurrection was probably based on the prophetic words of Daniel 12:2, “Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt.” However, Jesus responded to Martha by saying, “I am the resurrection and the life” (11:25). Jesus was refashioning Martha’s belief concerning the resurrection, in that while the eschatological resurrection will certainly occur, those who believe in Him already have eternal life here and now. In other words faith in Jesus results in eternal life both now and hereafter.[31]

Jesus’ raising Lazarus is also significant in that it serves as a sign of judgment on the unbelieving Israelite nation and its leaders. Jesus had previously stated that He would no longer perform public miracles to convince the nation that He was the Son of God, and that the only sign left to give the nation would be the sign of Jonah (cf. Matt. 12:38-40).[32] The Jewish leaders’ persistence of unbelief and rejection led to their decision to take Jesus’ life. Their determined will did not waver until they arrested Jesus and handed Him over to be crucified and die a criminal’s death. The proximity of this seventh and climactic miracle to the Passover events, both literarily and chronologically, reveals John’s obvious intent to show that Jesus’ imminent and inevitable death was entirely according to the Father’s will. Jesus would go up to Jerusalem for the Passover to die as the Passover Lamb. As the “Lamb of God” He would take away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Conclusion

The miracle of Jesus’ raising Lazarus from the dead completes the Evangelist’s selected sign-miracles (σημεῖα) to present Jesus as the promised Messiah and the divine Son of God. It is climactic in that it is the greatest of Jesus’ seven miracles recorded in this Gospel. The miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead authenticated Jesus’ authority to grant eternal life to those who believe in Him. In raising Lazarus from the dead, Jesus was also demonstrating the validity of His own claims that He would rise again, and that He had the power and authority to do so. This miracle also illustrates Jesus’ claims that He will raise people at the eschatological resurrection. However, the eternal life that Jesus gives begins here and now for those who believe in Him.

Notes

  1. For detailed analyses of Jesus’ seven sign-miracles (σημεῖα) and their Christological and eschatological significance see Stephen S. Kim, “The Relationship of the Seven Sign-Miracles of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel to the Old Testament” (Ph.D. diss., Dallas Theological Seminary, 2001).
  2. C. H. Dodd, The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953), x. Dodd entitles this section the Book of Signs (chaps. 2-12), while he calls the second section the Book of Passion (chaps. 13-20). Raymond E. Brown also refers to the former section as the Book of Signs, but he refers to the latter section as the Book of Glory (The Gospel According to John[I–XII], Anchor Bible [Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966], cxxxviii). The first twelve chapters of the Gospel generally describe the events of Jesus’ public ministry, while the later chapters record the private Farewell Discourse of Jesus with His disciples (chaps. 13-17) and the Passion narrative (chaps. 18-20).
  3. Francis J. Moloney, Belief in the Word: Reading John 1-4 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993). These three chapters (2-4) form a literary unit because they are bounded not only geographically by the two Cana miracles but also thematically by presenting Jesus as the life-giving Messiah who grants eternal life to those who believe in Him. See also Moloney’s other important work, “From Cana to Cana (John 2:1-4:54) and the Fourth Evangelist’s Concept of Correct Faith,” in Studia Biblica 1978 II: Papers on the Gospels: Sixth International Congress on Biblical Studies, Oxford 1978, ed. E. A. Livingston, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series (Sheffield: JSOT, 1980), 2:185-213.
  4. R. Alan Culpepper, The Gospel and the Letters of John, Interpreting Biblical Texts (Nashville: Abingdon, 1998), 148-49. See also Francis J. Moloney, Signs and Shadows: Reading John 5-12 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996).
  5. Gary M. Burge, Interpreting the Gospel of John (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1992), 76-77. See also Brown, The Gospel According to John (I–XII), 419-98. Burge calls chapters 11-12 “Foreshadowings of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection,” while Brown refers to them by the words “Jesus Moves toward the Hour of Death and Glory.”
  6. For a more detailed discussion on the significance of the first and seventh sign-miracles of Jesus see chapter 2, “Σημεῖα and the Fourth Gospel,” in Kim, “The Relationship of the Seven Sign-Miracles of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel to the Old Testament.” The first and seventh miracles bracket the seven signs with the theme of revealing Jesus’ glory (2:11, 11:4; cf. 12:41).
  7. Craig S. Keener observes the literary and theological connections between the first and last of Jesus’ sign-miracles. “This climactic sign of Jesus’ ministry joins the opening sign in framing Jesus’ public ministry. The opening sign (2:1-11) recounts Jesus’ benevolence at a wedding; the last involves it at a funeral. The joy of weddings and mourning of funerals could function as opposites in ancient literature” (The Gospel of John: A Commentary [Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003], 2:835).
  8. Brown, The Gospel According to John (I–XII), 401-12. See also Gerald L. Borchert, John 1-11, New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1996), 327-45.
  9. The Feast of Tabernacles took place in the fall, while the Feast of Dedication was in the winter.
  10. For a detailed discussion of these events see Harold W. Hoehner, “Maccabees,” in International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986): 3:196-200. See also idem, “Between the Testaments,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979): 1:179-94.
  11. Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews 12.325.
  12. Borchert, John 1-11, 328.
  13. J. Carl Laney, John, Moody Gospel Commentary (Chicago: Moody, 1992), 200.
  14. Culpepper, The Gospel and Letters of John, 185.
  15. Unless indicated otherwise, all Scripture quotations are from the New International Version.
  16. Borchert, John 1-11, 350.
  17. Laney, John, 204.
  18. Culpepper, The Gospel and Letters of John, 186.
  19. Harold S. Songer, “John 5-12: Opposition to the Giving of True Life,” Review and Expositor 85 (summer 1988): 467.
  20. Merrill C. Tenney, “Topics from the Gospel of John: Part II: The Meaning of the Signs,” Bibliotheca Sacra 132 (April 1975): 153.
  21. This probably reflects the Jewish tradition that the soul hovered near the body for three days after burial but left after that. “The general belief was that the spirit of the deceased hovered around the body for three days in anticipation of some possible means of reentry into the body. But on the third day it was believed that the body lost its color and the spirit was locked out. Therefore the spirit was obliged to enter the chambers of Sheol (the place of the dead)” (Borchert, John 1-11, 354).
  22. Resurrection of the dead in the last days is clearly taught in the Old Testament (Ps. 16:8-11; Isa. 26:14; Dan. 12:1-4). In the first century the Sadducees denied the resurrection, but the Pharisees affirmed it. The common people usually shared the beliefs of the Pharisees. Thus it is not surprising that Martha confessed her faith in that doctrine.
  23. Jesus’ statement in 11:25, “I am the resurrection and the life” (᾿Εγώ εἰμι ἡ ἀνάστασις καὶ ἡ ζωή) is the fifth of seven “I am” (᾿Εγώ εἰμι) statements with a predicate in the Fourth Gospel. This fifth “I am” strongly affirms His deity.
  24. Songer, “John 5-12: Opposition to the Giving of True Life,” 467.
  25. Dodd, The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel, 365.
  26. The titles confessed by Martha about Jesus (ὁ Χριστὸς ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ) are the same two titles mentioned in John’s “purpose statement” (20:30-31) as the aim of the sign-miracles. The perfect tense of the verb “I believe” (πεπίστευκα) reflects the presence of her faith in Jesus already.
  27. Culpepper, The Gospel and Letters of John, 189.
  28. Laney, John, 214.
  29. Tenney, “Topics from the Gospel of John: Part II: The Meaning of the Signs,” 154.
  30. Andreas J. Köstenberger notes four Old Testament instances of raising the dead: Elijah’s raising the widow’s son (1 Kings 17:17-24); Elisha’s raising the son of the Shunammite woman (2 Kings 4:32-37); Elisha’s “posthumous” raising of the dead man (2 Kings 13:21); and the witch of Endor’s illicit summoning of Samuel from the dead at King Saul’s request (1 Sam. 28). “Raisings of the dead were generally viewed in light of the final resurrection and as an expression of God’s power to bring it about” (John, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament [Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004], 321-22).
  31. Moloney, Signs and Shadows, 161.
  32. J. Dwight Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981), 344.